User talk:Eduardog3000

Template:Life States
Hello. Please Eduardog3000, do not revert my edit to template:Life States, I said that I would do a template for pet life states and you still revert it? Please take this as a warning. Thank you. -- RoseGui ( talk here )  10:15, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd like to inform you that Template:Pet Life States has already been made by Vss2eip, but it is currently requiring fix. Thank you. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 10:37, September 7, 2011 (UTC)


 * There will only be one "pet life state" for a long while, keep the Unicorn on Template:Lifestate as the unicorn is a life state, and nothing says that that it has to be a sim turning into the life state to be considered a life state, there is no "Pet Life State" page, and the Unicorn is listed on the Life State page.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 20:17, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Whatever. Pet Life State could then be created. But instead of keeping edit warring with me tell me first the reasons for why you are reverting the edit. Thank you. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 20:32, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have already told you why, and Pet Life State would be a short page, it is better just to keep it all on one page and template.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 20:35, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
Ok, 1. standard block time is 3 days, not a week, so at least shorten the block, and 2. how about taking this to other admins.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 20:38, September 7, 2011 (UTC)

And who's to say you shouldn't be blocked, you're doing the same thing as me.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 20:38, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I asked you for a consensus and discussion, that's what we should do when the edit warring is kept for long. Eduardog3000, you're not in the position of making any demands, you have actually have already some history of edit warring, so the block will be kept to 1 week. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 20:44, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Exactly what consensus did you ask for? And I have been trying to discuss it with you, but when it comes to that, it is better to leave the page how it was before the discussion is over, not to make new pages while the discussion is happening. Also, a discussion between you and me would not be enough, you need to take this to other admins.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 20:48, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry, I didn't mean asking for a consensus, I meant trying to reach a consensus. I will not make any new pages before we end this discussion. And what do you mean by taking this to other admins? Didn't this happen only between us? Thank you. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 20:51, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Your block has been shortened to 1 day. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 20:57, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for shortening my block, and lets try to leave the pages alone until we reach an agreement. And the following I tried to post but you posted before me: Are we the only ones who will be viewing the template? The choice can not be made by two disagreeing editors. Even just one other admin would help us make a decision instead of sitting at a stalemate that you have the unfair advantage of adminship over.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 21:01, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see what you mean. I thought you were talking about the block. About the template, there were many administrators that worked on it, and we talked about it on IRC, the ones who gave opinion agreed with the template, so I'm not sure. Feel free to start a discussion about it once your block ended. Thank you. -- RoseGui [[File:Thanks rose.png]] ( talk here ) 21:04, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi. I've discussed your block with another admin on IRC and we've changed it to three days based on past actions of a similar nature. Please know that this could be considered your final warning, and any similar actions could result in a permanent block. Also, your attitude towards RoseGui was unacceptable, and I'd advise you to heed my warning. Thank you.
 * Still not sure what I did that RoseGui didn't, and I had no attitude towards RoseGui.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 02:56, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I have strong disagreement with the tone you take here, Wogan. The incidents that Eduardog participated in in the past are just that - in the past. The issue has long since been dealt with, so this is not the place to be making final warnings, in my humble opinion. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 05:13, September 8, 2011 (UTC)

How come I am still blocked?--Eduardog3000 Ed G 14:55, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Somehow, the autoblock (which automatically blocks your IP address) was duplicated. It has now been removed, so you should be able to edit. 15:07, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

Thank you.--Eduardog3000 Ed G 15:19, September 11, 2011 (UTC)

IRC ban
You have been banned from the IRC channel for one week for flooding the channel unnecessarily. Please note that if you repeat your disruptive behaviour again, you will receive a longer ban. Thanks! 23:03, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Really, I was just being bored, what did I really do wrong, it isn't like I annoyed anyone (on purpose anyways). It isn't like I would do that if people were actually on. --Eduardog3000 Ed G 03:55, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Bored or not, it's not acceptable to flood the channel like that to try and get attention, pass the time or whatever it was you were trying to do, especially as everything you entered was all within a short space of time. Also, the channel is logged 24/7 by two chanops (one being myself) so everything that happens is seen by someone. The ban stands. 07:57, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

User:Eduarbot3000
I am sorry to tell you, but your "bot" was perma-blocked because unauthorized bots aren't allowed. 23:43, April 7, 2012 (UTC)