Talk:Seating

Splitting the page up according to game
Originally posted by K6ka on User talk:ThePeculiarMe:

"That seems like a software limitation. We'll have to split the article up into individual games, like this one. The article was split up according to game. So in this case, there could be a Chair (The Sims), Chair (The Sims 2), and Chair (The Sims 3)... and Chair (The Sims 4) when appropriate. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 13:12, June 20, 2014 (UTC)"

So the idea here is that we split up the chairs page according to game, in order to add more information about each object without jumping the limit MediaWiki has. Thoughts? --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 13:14, June 20, 2014 (UTC)


 * It could be fine. Oh, and I see some inspiration here to add up as well. Although, TS3 has more chairs with all the Expansion Packs and Stuff Packs. So, I'll put one object per Packs. And I suggest not all the chairs but the Toilet Bath tub and Hot tub articles to split up if they are in limit.  .ThePeculiarMe  |  (talk to me)   |  (my mistakes)  13:24, June 20, 2014 (UTC)


 * (edit conflict)The page throws a "Node-count limit exceeded" error if there are too many templates on the page. Information about the error: here and here. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 13:26, June 20, 2014 (UTC)


 * Personally, I'd oppose the idea. I see no significance to list every single chair that exists in the game that has no distinction from each other, and basically any other object classes, like fridges, toilets, showers, hot tubs, and so on. They're basically one thing but has many variations. I think listing too many objects makes the article look like a catalog and cluttered. I feel like the article is losing its point.


 * However, I'm not sure which objects may have their variations listed. I feel like objects like guitars, or TVs, or computers, are fine. Probably because the variations aren't too many? Then again, I feel like my judgement is very subjective. I wonder if there's any other solutions while it remains objective. Maybe we could just add the thumbnail to the gallery, without having to describe the details?  Nikel  Talk  –  Vote!  17:52, June 23, 2014 (UTC)


 * Would it be like this? If so then I like to support that.  .ThePeculiarMe  |  (talk to me)  |  (my mistakes)  08:50, June 24, 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, probably. I still don't know if there are any better ideas though.  Nikel  Talk  –  Vote!