User talk:Wiryawan310

Please explain to me why you reverted my edit on the Sims 3 patch table
Hi. Yesterday I added some details to the patch table of The Sims 3. You reverted everything. Why? The informations I added were ALL CORRECT. 79.147.78.139 (talk) 16:03, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * No, all info you add is WRONG! for example latest patch for world adventures is 2.17.2 and that patch belong to patch 22 not patch 31. Also there is NO patch 28, you can check it on the sims 3 update page. Please do not add wrong info to the article because you can be blocked by administrator. Wiryawan310 16:31, March 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * My current game version is 1.31.118. All those numbers were taken by hoovering the mouse over the icons of the various expansions displayed at the bottom left of the game launcher. How's that wrong??? When it says "patch", that just means the game version, it doesn't matter if there is an actual patch for it released by itself or if the patch was only included with the installation of a new expansion. That table is just meant to list all the various game versions. Up to patch 22 everything is filled up on the table, I was attempting at filling the empty fields. You are making this attempt impossible. 79.147.78.139 (talk) 20:19, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
 * Do you know that since patch 22 ea not creating a new patch for all expansion pack anymore? after patch 22, ea only made 1 superpatch and that is for the sims 3 only so all game version displayed at the bottom left of the game launcher is the old version of the patch or the version when the game released (for generations and after or if you not patching your game at all). The table purpose is for recoding patch/game updates released by ea and newly released game expansion/stuff pack version.
 * I appreciate your effort to fill the empty field but the correct information on the table is the empty one and if you fill the empty one with the old game version the table will become wrong. Wiryawan310 20:32, March 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay then, I understand. But if only the base game's version is relevant after patch 22, why do we still have it written what's the version for the last expansion released? For example, why is it listed that Showtime's version is 12.0.273 if it doesn't matter anymore what's an expansion's version after patch 22? 79.147.78.139 (talk) 20:53, March 10, 2012 (UTC)


 * I already explained above, because that is the version when the game released. Wiryawan310 03:39, March 11, 2012 (UTC)


 * You are saying what it is, not why it is relevant. If an expansion's version number is relevant when it is released, then why is it not relevant after? You say that after patch 22 only the base game version is important, yet we include the expansion's version number when it gets released. Then why not keep track of all expansion's versions like in the beginning of the table?
 * But you know what, whatever. I don't have that much time to argue. You guys on wikias act like articles are yours and it's either your way or your way. So nevermind, have it your way. 79.147.78.139 (talk) 03:46, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Answer to stupid question
Ohai, dude.

So, we can determine the head and the tail of an earthworm by placing a worm on a rough piece of paper and observing which direction it travels, because they will usually extend their head in first place when they crawl. :P 19:05, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Regarding reverted edit on ghost page
Okay, BUT a ghost pet is a ghost, why can't it still be on the ghost page? Every ghost on that page has its own page but those are still on the ghost page. A ghost pet is a ghost, and a ghost baby (from ghost potion) is still a ghost. They have their own page, but so does every other ghost on that page. I don't see why they aren't worthy of being on the ghost page when they are unique ghosts. Clubers 16:53, March 11, 2012 (UTC) clubers
 * One of the reason we separate the ghost article is because if we put it only in one page those page will become too crowded. so it will be better to separate the article. Wiryawan310 17:22, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Finally!
Hey, Wir! Tomorrow is my last day of UAS, and then I can be back in this wiki all day again! Just until several weeks before UAN, though... :p This last day... well, I'm not really ready for it. I completely rely on my friend for this one...  Nikel  Talk  13:35, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha, you want to test me? I know the answer. Just see the direction where it slithers. The direction it goes is the head. Surely it doesn't move backwards, right?
 * Guess you thought I didn't monitor your talk page, huh? :p  Nikel  Talk  15:54, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
 * Wath da heck! Wrong?? Geez... Okay, I give up. I'll figure it out tomorrow. ><a  Nikel  Talk  16:04, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

About a block you made...
Wir, I have reverted this anonymous user's block because all they did was blank one page. A 3 day block was severely jumping the gun and a warning (which I've already given to the user) is much more suited, especially as it was just one edit. In future when taking action against a user, please consider whether or not it is really worth blocking someone without a warning, especially if it was only one edit. 22:14, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Fanon cleanup
Can you please tell me what i need to add to Fanon:Life Style (Part 1) to make someone take away the cleanup tag. ! SCHNETZKA  ! ( talk ) 18:21, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

How do i make a template like you recommended? ! SCHNETZKA  ! ( talk ) 18:41, March 17, 2012 (UTC)

cleanup?
Can you please look about halfway down the page of my Fanon:Rebecca Carter and you could probably see a fanon cleanup. I decided to add all the things from the fanon i wanted deleted, so it would be neater. I copied and pasted (from my own work). Is this cleanup nesessary, just wanted to know. ! SCHNETZKA  ! ( talk ) 12:37, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

Cooking (The Sims 3)
I added the "clarify" tag because I wasn't sure that I'd gotten your meaning right. Dharden (talk) 18:55, March 18, 2012 (UTC)

RE:Past Editor
Is that his own test wiki? Woah, I think he's really holding up personal grudge... with no reason. I think there's no reason he's angry at you (he even blocked you). It looks like he's really into The Sims... look at his avatar and badges! <:) If only he wanted to behave and follow the rules here... :/ Even being a reader is more respectable than a notorious vandal!  Nikel  Talk  13:36, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * ... I take my words... it looks like he's not going to fix his behavior any sooner... or maybe even never. -_o  Nikel  Talk  13:39, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * I wish he'd stop! He's acting so childish! >:/  Nikel  Talk  13:41, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Lol. How mean of you, to laugh at that. XDD Wir, I suggest you add a talk link in your signature... it's a pain to click twice to reply you. O.o  Nikel  Talk  13:49, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not an order, okay? :)  Nikel  Talk  13:55, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
 * Umm... there isn't talk link in the old signature either... :s  Nikel  Talk  14:02, March 20, 2012 (UTC)

Showtime Logo
I have Showtime logo, but it has shadow dropdown, unlike preceding EP logos. :/ Should it replace the current one?  Nikel  Talk  10:48, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * Compare these:


 * I don't know, because the shady effect makes it inconsistent with the others. :/ I believe it's extracted in-game. The shadow seems to be a disturbing effect.  Nikel  Talk  12:09, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
 * The result, if I use the 2nd logo for Sim template, is bad. The logo will become distorted because it's too small. :/ I'll just have to use the original one.  Nikel  Talk  15:32, March 22, 2012 (UTC)

Hint on multiple reverts
Hey, I noticed that you had undone two edits in a row to Genie. I wanted to be sure that you knew of a shortcut in bringing a page back to a previous version. All you have to do is open the page history, open up the version of the page you want to use, edit that version of the page, then save the edit. You don't even have to make any changes to the version if you don't want to. It saves over any other edits to the page, including vandalism, and makes it so you don't have to use the undo tool. --  LostInRiverview talk · blog 00:41, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Wir...
... Long time no see. How have you been? (: -- RoseGui ( talk here )  13:13, March 26, 2012 (UTC)

Blocking without warning users
Wiryawan, before blocking a user please ensure they have been warned first, especially if it was only one or two edits. I have replaced two blocks you issued with warnings as I felt that the blocks were a little too harsh. Chances are if they're warned for their edits first, they'll most likely acknowledge it and move on. Also, block lengths are in most cases meant to start at 1 day and then escalate if they disrupt the wiki further, though there are cases in which a longer block would be acceptable if their disruptive edits are widespread enough.

I know you hate vandals with a passion; I'm sure every other administrator does too but you should at least give them a chance to redeem themselves before they're blocked.

tl;dr? If the user has only made a couple (or less) of disruptive edits, warn them before blocking them. 17:38, March 31, 2012 (UTC)