Category talk:Fanon for deletion

Please use this page to discuss fanon pages that have been labeled for deletion.


 * Guidelines


 * Make a level 2 header with the link and title of the fanon article/file.
 * If it's a file, include a small thumbnail to the right.
 * Strike out the title when it has been resolved.

Fanon:Sims Army Special Forces Training Manual
Personally, I think (at the moment) that this page does warrant deletion as it looks more like some kind of fictious advertisement than a fanon story. I think we should wait for further consenseus and to see if the creator improves it. 16:32, March 9, 2011 (UTC)

Fanon:Bella Jackson
The page is empty and has some things that don`t make sense Toddler who is a zombie died from cow plant in university with a custom major it just doesn`t make sense! Xxgreenbunnyxx 10:38, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with the deletion, but we may wait a bit to see if its creator improves it otherwise a deletion should be issued. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 10:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * No improvement has been made in a substantial time(one week). Deleted. --W H  (Talk) 07:49, May 14, 2011 (UTC)

Fanon:The Motel
I think this page doesn't really belong here in the Fanon namespace, for the following reasons: I'd like to know what you think about this matter. 18:50, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * For starters, the formatting is a mess, being just one long paragraph and making it really hard to read.
 * Secondly, the content is somewhat disturbing, since it is, in a nutshell, a story about how school children made the new student get naked and "lay on the rug and make rub angels as if it was snow", which has no place in this Wiki.
 * Lastly, I saw no evidence of this fan fiction being related to The Sims series at all.


 * This isn't really a fanon, it's basically a little tale on a bunch of kids getting naked together and making rug angels on rugs. It also has nothing to do with The Sims. I say we say goodbye to the 'fanon' and don't look back. Beds (talk - blog ) 19:00, September 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * There is definitely no relation to The Sims there, so I agree, it should be removed, no real question about it. --eduardog3000 19:00, September 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * Support Not related to The Sims series at all, other than it looking like it was written by someone who's too immature to grasp the concept of nudity... yeah, it just doesn't belong. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 20:13, September 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Support Not related to The Sims series at all, other than it looking like it was written by someone who's too immature to grasp the concept of nudity... yeah, it just doesn't belong. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 20:13, September 16, 2014 (UTC)


 * I support for this as per above. I find this story a very disturbingly disgusting one and it makes the author a pedophile herself. (No offense for the author :|)  .ThePeculiarMe  |  (talk to me)  |  (my mistakes)  05:54, September 17, 2014 (UTC)

Conclusion
As there is consensus for deletion, it has been deleted. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 10:56, September 23, 2014 (UTC)

Fanon:Fajid Al Madbouli
Not only are the required templates for a fanon page missing, but the formatting is wack as well. It hasn't been touched in about a month.

http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/Fanon:Fajid_Al_Madbouli

--Ms. RandomFeline54 (talk) 21:42, April 13, 2015 (UTC)


 * The fanon is currently not tagged for deletion (see Delete), so it doesn't warrant a new discussion here. I have added Fanon-cleanup to the page. --I am  k6ka  Talk to me!   See what I have done  21:52, April 13, 2015 (UTC)

Fanon:Serenity
I feel this page page has been around too long and is too un-detailed that it should be deleted. DarkSuicune2000 16:06, November 27, 2015 (UTC)
 * Deleted. In the future, if you want any of your fanon deleted, simply tag it for deletion; if you're nominating your own fanon, there doesn't need to be any discussion here. --  LiR talk • blog  •  contribs 16:48, November 27, 2015 (UTC)

Fanon:Sims 2 Conversions!
This fanon page seems to consist only of images (with no text whatsoever), and the images don't even belong to the fanon's author in question, but were taken from other websites.

The links to the images as are follows:


 * http://www.modthesims.info/download.php?t=203883
 * http://www.aussietopenders-sims2.com/SkinsAndGenetics.htm
 * http://whattheskell.tumblr.com/post/35716427455/almost-to-700-followers-so-heres-a-gift-for-you
 * http://www.modthesims.info/download.php?t=250928
 * http://www.modthesims.info/download.php?t=242085

Fanon should contain at least some original content. The fanon namespace was not intended to be a place to simply store content that's not appropriate for the main namespace. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 12:42, March 15, 2017 (UTC)


 * Support for the reasons K6ka has said. SimDestroyer (talk) 19:34, August 2, 2017 (UTC)


 * Support - Per above. ― C.Syde  ( talk  |  contribs ) 06:32, October 6, 2017 (UTC)

Fanon:Noah Erickson
Upon reflection, this sim does not have a large enough role in my player stories to warrant having his own page. -Orangeguy99 —Preceding undated comment added 18:33, August 2, 2017 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~


 * ✅ Just to note, there is no need to create a deletion discussion thread for a fanon page that you own. You can simply tag it for deletion and it will be deleted once an administrator sees it. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 19:55, August 2, 2017 (UTC)

Fanon:Smith family
This fanon page that I have marked for deletion, is stub and has not been updated in 4 years. The author also seems to be globally disabled by wikia. SimDestroyer (talk) 19:22, August 2, 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose This fanon has some supporting pages with more than stub content. Things like Fanon:George Smith and Fanon:Alice Smith have ample content to remain, and there is no reason for the family page that holds it all together to be deleted. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 19:55, August 2, 2017 (UTC)


 * Oppose - Per above. ― C.Syde  ( talk  |  contribs ) 06:34, October 6, 2017 (UTC)