Here you can vote for your choice for the new logo. To vote, follow these guidelines to submit your choice:
Place #--~~~~ underneath the submission you wish to vote on. The code will automatically convert into your user name and the time of your vote.
You may only vote once. Each bullet (#) counts as a vote. If you change your mind please remove your previous vote, otherwise you second vote will be removed as an attempt to vote more than allowed.
This is good, got plenty of stuff surrounding the title, not to pixelated and clear. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simsun (talk • contribs) - Sign your comments with ~~~~
This is good. It's clear and colourful.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabtowner (talk • contribs) - Sign your comments with ~~~~
This is the best of all here. - JEA13[iTalk] 08:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
It's simple, with a single motive and the name of the wiki. That's the recipe for a good logo. Trull's is nice too, but is too simillar to Wikipedia's (creativity is good). - Oset•c 14:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Skulenotcule 17:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC) I was torn between this one and Trull's.
--TheXmas 19:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC) (I spent lot of time making my logo and I don't want it to be "just because", I am sorry. So, I am voting for my own creation because I know no one would ever vote for my logo.)