The Sims Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/K6ka (February 2015)
Nomination[edit source]
k6ka (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
The user JustinLovesWikia12345 has requested that k6ka be nominated for Bureaucrat. The user believes that k6ka would make a fine bureaucrat due to the dedication that he has for the wiki. This belief is also shared in part on my side as well: he has indeed made frequent edits in the wiki, and is one of the most active members of the wiki, frequently taking part in communications, handling users, etc. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 20:18, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Note: the user that requested this nomination has been blocked from editing The Sims Wiki. Therefore, I am inclined to say that this nomination is null-and-void. However, Mathetesalexandrou has indicated support for the nomination as well. So, as a result, I will be closing this nomination unless Mathetesalexandrou wishes to "adopt" it. If he would like to do so, then we can proceed along as usual, and K6ka can either accept or decline the nomination being made by Mathetesalexandrou. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:27, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Adoption seems like a good thing. I proceed to take the nomination over. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 22:36, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- This nomination has been adopted by a user in good standing and is valid. It now awaits a response from the nominee. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Well... I suppose if a response is necessary, I would like to humbly accept this nomination. Thank you Mathetesalexandrou for nominating me! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 22:44, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- This nomination has been adopted by a user in good standing and is valid. It now awaits a response from the nominee. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 22:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Adoption seems like a good thing. I proceed to take the nomination over. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 22:36, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Discussion[edit source]
Please include your comments below. This discussion shall last at least five days. Time remaining until the minimum deadline has elapsed: .
Given my choice to adopt the nomination and the rationales given above, I don't really need to further explain my position, do I? MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 23:10, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: There's literally no way I can possibly include all of K6ka's positive traits in one comment. He is an expert at how wikis work and a stellar administrator. He is very active in community discussions, projects and other endeavors. He is kind, friendly, approachable, helpful, and assumes good faith in users. K6ka is completely qualified for this promotion and he has earned it. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 23:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a combination of highly dedicated to this wiki, being well versed on the workings of wikis in general and in addition is experienced with wiki administration, both here and elsewhere. In addition, the somewhat dwindling activity of the other bureaucrats means that I feel like we could probably do with another one as well. If you put that together with what has already been said I see no downside to this nomination and I can only see the wiki being better off as a result. Best of luck with your nomination! ―ฬђ talk 00:42, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: All I can say is that this request is a no-brainer. I was wondering when the day would come that K6ka would request or be nominated to be a 'crate. I see no reason why he shouldn't be and all the reason why he should be (which have been mentioned over). -- Icemandeaf (talk) 01:35, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support (wholeheartedly): I definitely support K6ka's nomination for bureaucrat status. I believe that the powers of a bureaucrat would only improve this dedicated member's ability to help the wiki develop into one even better than it already is and to protect the community and the wiki's content from those who wish to do it harm. Therefore, like Icemandeaf, I think it's a no-brainer: K6ka certainly should become a bureaucrat. Good luck, K6ka! ―The Tim Man (Infinite Histories • Galactic Crucibles • The Sims Wiki • Hallows Maleficent • Why I'm here in the first place) 03:29, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - I fully trust k6ka to become a bureaucrat. He's very active, friendly to other users, great in editing and organizing the wiki, always participates in discussions... you name it all. I have no doubt k6ka is one of the best editors in this wiki. It takes no time to consider whether he should be a crat or not! Nikel Talk – Vote! 05:26, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - k6ka seems like a good person in real life and most of their edits (i know he's a dude, but i would pronounce k6ka as "Keka" and i see it as a girl's name.) seem constructive, like fixing "formation" and spelling error's. - Kaiko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiko Mikkusu (talk • contribs) 07:50, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support: K6ka is a very good guy/girl. He/she is very active and friendly. I support the nomination. --AStranger195 —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support: Well, most of my reasons had been told. K6ka is a great editor. He already has high positions from Wikipedia and Wikia that he had join. Not only that he's a great editor but he's also a helpful and good person. I highly doubt that he wouldn't get this position. ThePeculiarMe (talk to me) (my mistakes) 11:27, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - K6ka would make an excellent member of the bureaucrat team, and would be able to use his skills and knowledge to make the wiki a better place. I have full trust and support in him, and I have no doubts in him whatsoever. Beds (talk - blog) 14:01, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support:k6 deserves to be a bureaucrat, I'm 100% sure he'll make this wiki wonderful (even thought he already did), he is one of the BEST editors ever on this wiki, and he deserves to be a bureaucrat. Imasexysimlover (talk) 14:55, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a great member of the Wiki and he has shown a really good performance over the last months in which he has held the administrator position. His skills and good nature make him a worthy recipient of the Bureaucrat position. DanPin • talk • contribs 17:54, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Nuff said!!! thatKitten come and chat! 07:45, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a great member of the Wiki and he has shown a really good performance over the last months in which he has held the administrator position. His skills and good nature make him a worthy recipient of the Bureaucrat position. DanPin • talk • contribs 17:54, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support:k6 deserves to be a bureaucrat, I'm 100% sure he'll make this wiki wonderful (even thought he already did), he is one of the BEST editors ever on this wiki, and he deserves to be a bureaucrat. Imasexysimlover (talk) 14:55, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - K6ka would make an excellent member of the bureaucrat team, and would be able to use his skills and knowledge to make the wiki a better place. I have full trust and support in him, and I have no doubts in him whatsoever. Beds (talk - blog) 14:01, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Well, most of my reasons had been told. K6ka is a great editor. He already has high positions from Wikipedia and Wikia that he had join. Not only that he's a great editor but he's also a helpful and good person. I highly doubt that he wouldn't get this position. ThePeculiarMe (talk to me) (my mistakes) 11:27, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: K6ka is a very good guy/girl. He/she is very active and friendly. I support the nomination. --AStranger195 —Preceding undated comment added 10:40, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support - k6ka seems like a good person in real life and most of their edits (i know he's a dude, but i would pronounce k6ka as "Keka" and i see it as a girl's name.) seem constructive, like fixing "formation" and spelling error's. - Kaiko. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaiko Mikkusu (talk • contribs) 07:50, February 1, 2015 (UTC) (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
- Support - I fully trust k6ka to become a bureaucrat. He's very active, friendly to other users, great in editing and organizing the wiki, always participates in discussions... you name it all. I have no doubt k6ka is one of the best editors in this wiki. It takes no time to consider whether he should be a crat or not! Nikel Talk – Vote! 05:26, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
Such overwhelming support. Should we close this as a successful one? MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 03:03, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Policy mandates five days of discussion at a minimum. At this time passage seems assured, but the five day minimum is intended to allow anyone who may object to the promotion ample time to make their opinion known. We typically would only close early if there's not a snowball's chance of passage, and in that case we close mainly out of respect for the applicant/nominee. -- LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 03:06, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
Support: My word is probably going to echo everybody else in this discussion, but aside from that K6ka is one of the most active users in this wiki, with over 9,000 edits, countless templates and discussions and certainly counting. And while I personally don't enjoy praising just about everything, there's nothing from me to say that he doesn't deserve this promotion. I'm sure he can put bureaucrat powers into good use. Congrats! EpicJoyBoy (My talk page!) 04:28, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: From what I've seen, K6ka is clearly deserving and I often forget that he isn't a bureaucrat already. Congratulations and good luck! Joey.eyeball (talk) 07:38, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support: Per everyone else. K6ka is pretty active and is very experienced with editing the wiki, not to mention responsability. In my opinion, he deserves this right. OpelSpeedster (talk) 22:55, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
- Support - Per above. Frostwalker Talk - Read 13:46, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
Conclusion[edit source]
After the required time has elapsed it's clear that the community supports this nomination. As a result, K6ka has been promoted to bureaucrat. Congratulations! ―ฬђ talk 23:34, February 5, 2015 (UTC)