Anonymous user
Forum:Adding incomplete information?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Auror Andrachome No edit summary |
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
||
Line 6:
Personally, I would err towards including the information even if it's not complete. Adding it to the article allows other users to fill in the missing pieces, whereas if it's placed on the talk page, other users might not notice it. Try to use the {{t|Expand}} tag on sections that are missing information. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 22:43, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
:Going with what Liron just said, I'd rather we just add the information to the article itself rather than to the talk page. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 22:50, May 31, 2014 (UTC)
::Joining the bandwagon. Also per [[wikipedia:WP:WIP|WP:WIP]] and [[wikipedia:WP:IMPERFECT|WP:IMPERFECT]]. Even Wikipedia doesn't hesitate to admit that some of their own articles are complete rubbish, so there's no reason why we shouldn't. --'''[[:User:K6ka|k6ka]]''' ([[:User talk:K6ka|talk]] | [[:Special:Contributions/K6ka|contribs]]) 00:15, June 2, 2014 (UTC)
| |||