Forum:Adding potentially non-canon images to articles: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 20:13, 12 July 2013 (edit) imported>Mate1234 (→‎Discussion) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:22, 12 July 2013 (edit) (undo) imported>Random Ranaun No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 41:		Line 41:

	::::::Because all users are supposed to improve the articles the best they can. Now you answer mine: How did TheXmas´ images survived for 4 years? [[User:Mate1234\|Mate1234]] ([[User talk:Mate1234\|talk]]) 20:13, July 12, 2013 (UTC)		::::::Because all users are supposed to improve the articles the best they can. Now you answer mine: How did TheXmas´ images survived for 4 years? [[User:Mate1234\|Mate1234]] ([[User talk:Mate1234\|talk]]) 20:13, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

			:::::::That's the same argument you've given throughout this whole thread with no facts to back it up. I'll ask you again, why do you think your images are essential to improving the articles when we already have canon images that can serve the same purpose? —[[User:Random Ranaun\|<font color="#008000">Random Ranaun</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Random Ranaun\|<font color="#006400">Talk to me!</font>]])</sup> 20:22, July 12, 2013 (UTC)

Navigation menu