Anonymous user
Forum:Adding potentially non-canon images to articles: Difference between revisions
Forum:Adding potentially non-canon images to articles (edit)
Revision as of 12:54, 12 July 2013
, 10 years ago→Discussion
imported>Mate1234 |
imported>DeSims |
||
Line 24:
:::[[User:Random Ranaun|Random Ranaun]] says that they are unneeded and that they are fanon. However, I have licensed them as ''Sim from TS2'' because they are supposed to be that. However, [[User:TheXmas|TheXmas licensed]] them as fanon and posted them on canon article, and they were never removed. Then [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] said that I did it poorly. For some images, that´s true because I have no idea which tool [[User:TheXmas |TheXmas ]] used for his images.
:::<u>Only thing I wanted to do is improve the articles the best I can, and all users are supposed to do so.</u> And only Maxis made Sims are on those images, so I will say that they are not ''full'' fanon. [[User:Mate1234|Mate1234]] ([[User talk:Mate1234|talk]]) 06:44, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
:::Hmm, to be honest I don't like Mate1234's pictures for reasons said above me. However, fan made canon images are apparently accepted. So in that case I would suggest this: tell [[User:Mate1234|Mate1234]] the guidelines he needs to follow to create and add fan canon images (e.g. set [[User:TheXmas|TheXmas]] ones as example). And Mate1234 (and others) simple needs to follow these. [[User:Tiezel|<b><span style="font-family:Tempus Sans ITC"><span style="color:#9d2628">Tiezel</span></span></b>]] [[User_talk:Tiezel|<span style="font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#804e26"><sup>(talk)</sup></span></span>]] [[Fanon:Curious family|<span style="font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#804e26">curious?</span></span>]] 12:54, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
| |||