Anonymous user
Forum:Adding potentially non-canon images to articles: Difference between revisions
Forum:Adding potentially non-canon images to articles (edit)
Revision as of 20:26, 12 July 2013
, 10 years ago→Discussion
imported>Random Ranaun No edit summary |
imported>Mate1234 |
||
Line 43:
:::::::That's the same argument you've given throughout this whole thread with no facts to back it up. I'll ask you again, why do you think your images are essential to improving the articles when we already have canon images that can serve the same purpose? —[[User:Random Ranaun|<font color="#008000">Random Ranaun</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Random Ranaun|<font color="#006400">Talk to me!</font>]])</sup> 20:22, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
:::::::More images will give the better look to the article. Nobody likes only text with no images, including me and, probably you. Now you answer my question, please: How did TheXmas´ images survived for 4 years? [[User:Mate1234|Mate1234]] ([[User talk:Mate1234|talk]]) 20:25, July 12, 2013 (UTC)
| |||