Anonymous user
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests: Difference between revisions
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests (edit)
Revision as of 23:16, 4 June 2013
, 11 years ago→Shifting gears
imported>LostInRiverview m (→Discussion) |
imported>Pidgeoraptor7 |
||
Line 139:
* A period of discussion shall last at least five days.
* After the five day period of discussion has elapsed, it shall be determined whether a consensus has been reached. Consensus can only be reached in favor of a nominee, not in opposition to them. If the discussion shows consensus for a nominee, the nomination is successful and the user is promoted. If the discussion clearly shows a lack of consensus, the nomination will be ended and the nominee will not be promoted.
* In cases where a consensus is not clear after the initial discussion period, discussion will continue until there is a two-day long period, or longer, in which nothing is added to the discussion.
**If this occurs and a clear consensus exists, the nomination is successful and the user is promoted.
**'''''If this occurs and a consensus in support is not clear, the nomination will proceed to Stage 3.'''''
Line 153:
I hope that what I've put forward is a good compromise. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 22:54, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
:I see where you're coming from with the voting being an issue; many users (including myself) often don't really give any reason for why and this just seems even more in that direction since users can't explain their vote. I agree completely that voting should be a last resort and I really like the system you have put forward, especially because it gives much more time for opinions to be given. I'm completely in favor of this :) {{PGRSig}} 23:16, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
| |||