Anonymous user
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests: Difference between revisions
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests (edit)
Revision as of 19:46, 15 June 2013
, 10 years ago→Second Vote: changed vote
imported>AsherÉire |
imported>Lost Labyrinth (→Second Vote: changed vote) |
||
Line 197:
'''Option 2'''. First off, I don't really support Option 3. We've had this discussion ongoing for weeks, and I don't think additional time is going to bring forward many substantive ideas. As for the difference between options 1 and 2... to me, it comes down to which system is more fair. If a hypothetical user applied for rights and was turned down because some of the votes in their favor were found not to have strong enough reasoning behind them, that seems less fair than a system in which that applicant can have a straight up-or-down vote if there is unclear consensus. I've said it before but it's worth saying again... there's no really good way to implement a system where votes can be struck out, so it would make sense to create a system that avoids voting if possible. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 20:19, June 11, 2013 (UTC){{clr}}
----
'''
----
'''Option 2'''. ''To me'', it seems to be the most sensible and time efficient option. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 21:52, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
| |||