Anonymous user
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests: Difference between revisions
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests (edit)
Revision as of 23:18, 6 July 2013
, 10 years ago→Something else
imported>LostInRiverview |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
Line 241:
::That would also allow us to form a queue of RfA applicants/nominees if multiple people wanted to apply or be nominated at around the same time. The list would be first-come first-served, based on the order in which the applications or nominations were "ready" to be discussed. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 15:21, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
:::I guess the queue system could work. If as an alternative we thought about multiple requests, I wouldn't mind imposing a cap of 2 or 3 nominations at one time as Pidge suggested. I'm not hoping for a silver lining on that one though so I guess the queue system is probably our best bet, unless anybody else has another idea. {{LabSig}} 23:18, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
| |||