Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests: Difference between revisions

imported>Lost Labyrinth
imported>Pidgeoraptor7
Line 243:
:::I guess the queue system could work. If as an alternative we thought about multiple requests, I wouldn't mind imposing a cap of 2 or 3 nominations at one time as Pidge suggested. I'm not hoping for a silver lining on that one though so I guess the queue system is probably our best bet, unless anybody else has another idea. {{LabSig}} 23:18, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
::::I have no problem with the queue system, but will we be putting a limit on how long a nomination can go without a response from the nominee? {{PGRSig}} 02:22, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
:::::I like the idea of having a queue/the multiple pending requests, and I think what Pidge is saying about putting a limit on the amount of time between a nomination and an accept to that nomination, is a good idea too. ~ [[User:Waikikamukow|<font color="6a2286">Waikikamukow</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Waikikamukow|<font color="00b0f4">Anyone wanna chat?</font>]])</small> 07:06, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
 
Bumping this thread, it looks like having requests queue is accepted. As for having a time limit on pending requests... how long are we thinking? Two weeks, a month perhaps? -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:59, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
:Two weeks seems reasonable enough. In my opinion, there's really no point considering a user for an RfX if they're never here and, unless they're declared absent via their user page or other extreme circumstances, it really shouldn't take any more than 2 weeks for somebody to respond to their nomination. {{LabSig}} 23:58, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
::Two weeks is more than enough time to accept, so if that isn't enough time I don't know what is... I'm down with that. {{PGRSig}} 03:18, August 7, 2013 (UTC)