Anonymous user
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests: Difference between revisions
Forum:Addressing issues with rights requests (edit)
Revision as of 21:49, 4 June 2013
, 10 years ago→Shifting gears
imported>LostInRiverview |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
Line 138:
:::I for one agree primarily with #2, but disagree with the rest. As for #3, however, I do have an alternate suggestion:<strike> Have the RfA be a debate-style system in which the users votes for the superior argument, meaning this will eliminate the "user deserves it" without discarding the vote system which I think should stay as a whole, as the others who support the nomination could vote for the argument to show their favor.</strike> Probably will be impossible to implement, so disregard my idea. [[User:Mathetesalexandrou|<span style="color:#00CC33">MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, </span><span style="color:#00AADD">FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, </span><span style="color:#88AAAA">SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES </span>]] ([[user talk:Mathetesalexandrou]]) 03:11, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
::::For what it's worth, the idea you crossed out wouldn't be impossible to implement IMO. I don't necessarily support that approach, but it could be done. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 03:18, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
Having watched this thread the past week, it appears that the idea of having requests/nominations on subpages (with the main RfA page being more of a hub which lists the current RfAs) has been well received, but I also see a mixed response to everything else, with some supporting the idea of a commenting system but not others and the same case applies to the commentary period, as well as the one RfA at a time idea, even with regards to the individual subpages suggestion. It seems clear enough to me that there is a general agreement that the RfX process could do with being more discussion-based. Given some of the arguments here, finding a suitable compromise does seem difficult but I am open to that idea based on what we have so far.
I'll keep this running for a little while longer and see what we can get out of it. {{LabSig}} 21:49, June 4, 2013 (UTC)
| |||