Forum:Allowing featured articles to be re-featured: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Auror Andrachome (adding to discussion) |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Community discussions}}I think we could alleviate the frequent issue of not having current [[The Sims Wiki:Featured article|featured articles]] to display, by allowing previously-featured articles to be featured again. To do this would involve a simple change to the rule. |
{{Forumheader|Community discussions|archive}}I think we could alleviate the frequent issue of not having current [[The Sims Wiki:Featured article|featured articles]] to display, by allowing previously-featured articles to be featured again. To do this would involve a simple change to the rule. |
||
I propose that we allow an article that has been previously featured to be re-nominated and re-selected as a featured article (provided the article is still good enough to warrant being featured). Re-features would be considered in the same manner as new features are. I'd just add two stipluations: |
I propose that we allow an article that has been previously featured to be re-nominated and re-selected as a featured article (provided the article is still good enough to warrant being featured). Re-features would be considered in the same manner as new features are. I'd just add two stipluations: |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::I like the stipulations and I have no issue with articles being featured more than once. Articles that have been featured already, like [[Bella Goth]], have gone through '''significant''' revisions that would completely warren a second feature. I support this proposal overall. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 06:12, July 5, 2019 (UTC) |
::I like the stipulations and I have no issue with articles being featured more than once. Articles that have been featured already, like [[Bella Goth]], have gone through '''significant''' revisions that would completely warren a second feature. I support this proposal overall. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 06:12, July 5, 2019 (UTC) |
||
==Conclusion== |
|||
Closed for lack of consensus and lack of input in over a year and a half. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LostInRiverview</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 17:22, 21 April 2021 (UTC) |
|||