Forum:Articles for inhabited lots: Difference between revisions

:::That sounds like it's a good compromise. We're still getting the lot descriptions off the family articles, while at the same time we're not creating dozens of new stub or near-stub articles. What approach would you take to deal with already-existing pages for occupied lots (from TS and TS2)? -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]^{[[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]}''' 13:51, April 10, 2015 (UTC)

::::I'm not so sure about that. Normally, I'd merge the separate existing lot pages into the list of lots page. If the page isn't too expansive like [[223 Idlewild Street]], we can move the entire content to the list page; but if the page is quite long and detailed like [[165 Sim Lane]], it might be better to keep its own page, have it on the list page, and use {{T|Main}} to link it to the main page. But honestly, even a long page like 165 Sim Lane is sufficient to be moved to the list page altogether, IMO. [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;">_''Talk''</span>]] _– [[The Sims Wiki:Featured Media/Voting|<span style="color:red ; text-shadow:#E97451 0 4px 4px;">_''Vote!''</span>]] 08:51, April 11, 2015 (UTC)