Anonymous user
Forum:Changing requirements for rollback requests: Difference between revisions
Forum:Changing requirements for rollback requests (edit)
Revision as of 20:56, 30 April 2014
, 10 years agono edit summary
imported>Mathetesalexandrou |
imported>Lost Labyrinth No edit summary |
||
Line 12:
'''Support'''. k6ka said what I wanted to say as well: admin here do a very good job of reverting edits, and I myself had very little opportunity to undo bad edits myself. [[User:Mathetesalexandrou|<span style="color:#00CC33">MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, </span><span style="color:#00AADD">FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, </span><span style="color:#88AAAA">SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES </span>]] ([[user talk:Mathetesalexandrou]]) 02:13, April 27, 2014 (UTC)
I've always felt that rollback is seen as too much as a stepping stone to adminship rather than a tool to aid editors in assisting the wiki in good faith. It doesn't have to be seen this way and I have an idea of how we can change that but that's probably for another thread at another time. As for the matter at hand and going by how things are currently done, I'm in support of this proposal. It only makes sense. {{LabSig}} 20:56, April 30, 2014 (UTC)
| |||