Forum:Content moderators: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview
No edit summary
imported>Dharden
Line 55: Line 55:


-- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LiR</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 13:00, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
-- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LiR</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 13:00, August 12, 2016 (UTC)

:For point 3, I say no, since that would only maintain the "rollbacker bottleneck" noted [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Removing_rollback_requirement_for_admin_candidates here]. For point 1, I'd favor an opt-out process, and limit it to those that are currently active or semi-active; post that the new level has been added, and note that existing rollbackers will be promoted after (DATE) unless they decline. That allows time for the change to register, but gets it into play without having to wait for people to realize that they can ask for it. For point 2, start with the current RfR process, and maybe add some of the RfA process, since Content Moderators can do a fair amount of what admins do. For points 4 and 5, yes. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 14:44, August 12, 2016 (UTC)