Anonymous user
Forum:Creating articles for Gallery content: Difference between revisions
Forum:Creating articles for Gallery content (edit)
Revision as of 15:14, 11 March 2016
, 8 years agono edit summary
imported>LostInRiverview (←Created page with "{{Forumheader|Community discussions}} I'm starting this discussion as a result of this deletion nomination...") |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Community discussions|archive}}
I'm starting this discussion as a result of [[Category talk:Candidates for deletion#
:I would go with the rule that they have to have been in some other Maxis media (eg trailers or box art) to set a standard for notability. [[User:Vpetmad|<span style="color:#538;background:#99c">'''Vpetmad'''</span>]] [[User talk:Vpetmad|<span style="font-size:80%">(talk)</span>]] 21:29, January 13, 2016 (UTC)
::Although I originally supported the deletion of [[Aileen Rauvu]], I think that a Sim being up for download on an official EA account (whether MaxisCreator_01 or a SimGuru's) and appearing in a render, trailer, or screenshot is enough to have an article for them. [[User:Sumaes01|Sumaes01]] ([[User talk:Sumaes01|talk]]) 21:52, January 13, 2016 (UTC)
:::'''Closing''' there is no resounding consensus, but the general agreement from the two editors here is that Maxis Sims from the gallery should appear in at least some additional material before being given their own pages. The general conclusion, therefore, is that Maxis-made Sims on the gallery are considered canon for the purposes of the wiki, until or unless a discussion later determines differently. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LiR</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 15:14, March 11, 2016 (UTC)
|