Forum:Discussing notability and establishing a notability policy: Difference between revisions

{{Forumheader|Community discussions|archive}}

:I see a lot of mentions of a new namespace... my concern is what I'll call 'creep' - where we create a namespace, for instance ''Real-world'' (so ''Real-world:Name of article'') and say that real-world content gets added to that namespace. So this would catch pages about YouTubers and other well-known simmers, Sims series websites, and popular modifications. But you could argue that an article like [[The Sims 2]] (or about any game or EP) is itself about a real-world thing, and should be placed in this new namespace as well. The point I'm trying to make is, this stuff is all relevant to The Sims Wiki, so it should be within the main namespace. I'd support the categorization and review of real-world articles, but I don't see a whole lot of positive coming out of a new namespace.

:On the subject of review... I think it's important we specify what kind of reviewing we're doing. For starters, would it be reviewed by admins-only, or could any user assist in reviewing? Would it take more than one user/admin to review something? Would it be a ''passive'' review process or an ''active'' review process?

2. There is no limitation on creating real-world content articles'', as long as they are related to ''The Sims'' series of games. <s>However, a</s>Any user may question whether an article which has been created is notable enough to remain. If a user believes an article is not notable, they should tag it with the {{t|Notability}} template and begin discussing notability in the Community Discussions forum.''

{{VoteForVoteAgainst}} '''GameCustom ModificationsContent''' - 64 vs 2 (1 neutral)5{{clr}}

{{NeutralVoteFor}} '''ContentGame and Mod CreatorsModifications''' - 36 vs 32 (31 neutral){{clr}}