Anonymous user
Forum:Establishing Requests for IRC op/chatmod rights: Difference between revisions
Forum:Establishing Requests for IRC op/chatmod rights (edit)
Revision as of 23:10, 14 January 2013
, 11 years ago→Discussion
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
Line 17:
== Discussion ==
I'm in support of this idea, but I have two points/ideas to add. Firstly, could both requests be handled on one page, instead of two? Second and more importantly, would we establish in the guidelines for nomination/request, some sort of rule regarding whether or not an Op/Mod needs to be an active user on TSW? Some of the people in the IRC Channel and Chat may not be major contributors but might frequent those places, so I'd like to see it opened up to people even if they aren't frequent TSW users. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 23:00, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
:It can potentially be done on one page with say two different sections (one for Chat, other for IRC). Two pages seems easier but I'm open to what everyone else thinks. As far as guidelines/minimum requirements for eligibility are concerned...I'm not sure. I do remember a long time ago someone suggesting that we could give chat moderator status to rollbacks though only a few of the chat regulars are rollbacks and two of them, by my knowledge, are already chatmods. At this stage, all I can say as far as that subject goes is that we base it on how active one is in Chat/IRC (no point giving it to a lurker who never talks), how long they've been about and would they really benefit from the rights. That's all I have, aside from the obvious stuff, such as behaviour and whatnot (as there it's detrimental giving the rights to someone who is constantly getting banned, being told not to do something by a current op etc.). {{LabSig}} 23:10, January 14, 2013 (UTC)
| |||