Anonymous user
Forum:Establishing Requests for IRC op/chatmod rights: Difference between revisions
Forum:Establishing Requests for IRC op/chatmod rights (edit)
Revision as of 18:27, 17 January 2013
, 11 years ago→Discussion
imported>LostInRiverview |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
Line 53:
As for the IRC Ops matter... I agree with Georgie's proposed flags, except I'd like to also have them receive +v; while moderated chat is rare, it has happened before. Additionally, I think this and other flags could be given to these ops with the clear expectation (on the request page) that they be only used when necessary and not abused. As for the requests page itself... I think it should be a formal rather than an informal process, but I don't necessarily think each candidate needs to be subjected to the same scrutiny as if they were applying for an administrator position. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 17:34, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
:I do still feel that it should be a community vote similar to an RfA just to make it easier for one to give their input although how to make things friendlier...I don't know but as a visual aid to try and help us get somewhere, I'll draft up an RfIRCOp (for the lack of a better term) page.
:As an attempt to reach a compromise on the flags, +Aovri sounds reasonable enough and the non-admin ops shouldn't need any more than that.
:Finally, as it's fairly easy to manage and nobody seems to be against it, I'm cool with starting the RfCM (Requests for Chat Moderator) page whenever. {{LabSig}} 18:27, January 17, 2013 (UTC)
| |||