Anonymous user
Forum:Featured Content voting issue: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
Line 43:
::::That's just about all I can think of in regards to everything that's been posted so far. {{WHsig|03:43, January 5, 2015 (UTC)}}
:::::I think that everything that has been said about fanon so far is ''very'' deserving of an in-depth discussion, and it seems as though we have a few people who might be interested in talking about it. That being said, it's branching off of the original subject of this forum thread, so I think it would be best to continue the fanon discussion in a separate thread (which I
:::::Onto the subject at hand... I again would come around to the idea that we don't necessarily need to select a new feature each and every month. Surely if we select something as featured content, we intend to maintain (or increase upon) that level of quality in the content, so there would then be no harm in "re-featuring" that content later on. Doing this would eliminate the need to have votes constantly to select new material to feature. In the case of Featured Game Guides, to give an example, we could pick out the handful of high-quality game guides we have and feature those on a rotating basis, without being terribly concerned that we don't have new guides to feature. And if or when a guide is improved enough to be worthy of featuring, that guide could also be added to the rotation. The same would be true for fanon articles, mainspace articles, and media.
| |||