Anonymous user
Forum:Featured Content voting issue: Difference between revisions
→2 months later
imported>K6ka |
imported>LostInRiverview |
||
Line 74:
::Late bump, but I have an idea that would help somewhat with finding featured articles... my idea is that we would have article ratings, and trusted editors could evaluate an article and give it a rating depending on a variety of factors, mostly about how well the page is laid out and the quality of the text. Only articles above a certain rating can be nominated and featured, and if their rating falls before they get featured the nomination is suspended. Not sure if it helps with the embarrassing "oh no we don't have a featured article for this month", but it will at least weed out the crap that gets selected just because it's nominated. I will start its own discussion thread once I'm done writing it. --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 14:33, June 18, 2015 (UTC)
:::Both of these systems could be implemented in tandem. It wouldn't need to be an all-or-nothing thing. In the case of a curation system, it would probably be quicker to implement than an article ranking or a "Peer Review" system (as with Fanon Peer Review), but ultimately I think an article ranking system could be useful on many levels, not just features selection. I support both initiatives. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 16:12, July 8, 2015 (UTC)
| |||