Forum:Merging with the Customized Sims Wiki: Difference between revisions

Line 42:
 
;What CC pages ''don't'' include
*Sims, families and, neighborhoods/worlds, pets, lots etc. All of those pages should be moved under fanon and go under the policies of that namespace.
*CC creators. They shall stay in the main namespace.
*Other external programs such as package editors or mod creation tools.
Line 51:
In terms of notability, mods that only fix bugs shouldn't be included, like I said a bit earlier. In terms of very small mods, like a power outage mod or something, they could work as long as they have some form of depth. However, I think a mod that removes a single moodlet wouldn't work though. Cleanup, stub and other basic maintenance templates should be created for CC articles, and pretty much have the same rules.
 
I also think CC articles shouldn't be "owned" by someone like the fanon pages. The creator(s) of the mod could be listed in an infobox and generally in the article, but they should be open for anyone to edit the same way main namespace articles currently are. And since CC pages couldn't be owned by someone, the Sim, family, and neighborhood/world, pet and lot pages would be moved to the fanon namespace.
 
But yeah, "Custom content" is the name I would go for since it's the most easily noticeable one, I guess. - [[User:SimDestroyer|SimDestroyer]] ([[User talk:SimDestroyer|talk]]) 13:58, 16 April 2019 (UTC)