Anonymous user
Forum:Organization for TS4 timeline: Difference between revisions
→1 week later
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
imported>LostInRiverview |
||
Line 135:
:::Subpages! Subpages! *chants* Subpages! Subpages! Like I did with [[Special:PrefixIndex/Fireplace|Fireplace]]. I jumped the node count limit, so I had to split the page up. All of ''The Sims'' fireplaces got into one page, all of ''The Sims 2'' fireplaces into another, and all of ''The Sims 3'' fireplaces into the third. I found this to be a very effective solution, especially in reducing page load and saving times, which well exceeded the load and save times one would get in a CC-loaded game. --'''[[:User:K6ka|k6ka]]''' ([[:User talk:K6ka|talk]] | [[:Special:Contributions/K6ka|contribs]]) 02:09, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
::::I see that you're correct; even when previewing the page in "mobile view," the tabber is non-functional. I'm not a fan of subdividing onto separate pages but in this case I don't see there being much of a chance of avoiding it. If this is what we do, I would prefer we develop a more streamlined approach of linking the pages, instead of using {{t|Main}}. I'm not concerned that a page we would create would exceed the node count limit; in the case of Fireplace, it looks like {{t|object}} was severely overused. Instead of separating out into separate pages, why not just use a table instead of dozens of template calls? In any case, I'm not entirely sold on the idea of dividing pages up like this, but it seems to be the only option we have at this point. Thanks, EA. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 03:15, July 31, 2014 (UTC)
| |||