Anonymous user
Forum:Organization for TS4 timeline: Difference between revisions
→1 week later
imported>Joey.eyeball (→1 week later: Typo) |
imported>LostInRiverview |
||
Line 141:
:::::::::I'm with Auror. There is ''The Sims 3'',''The Sims'' and ''The Sims 2'' timeline, then the alternative ''The Sims 4'' timeline. [[User:Joey.eyeball|Joey.eyeball]] ([[User talk:Joey.eyeball|talk]]) 04:34, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
{{od|::::::::::}}
I agree that it's completely separate. But calling one the "main" continuity and the other an "alternate" continuity implies that the main continuity is more valid or more correct. I'm saying that we should treat both continuities as equally valid. After all, what happens if we get ''The Sims 5'' and ''The Sims 6'' all based on the "alternative" continuity established in ''The Sims 4''? Or what happens if ''The Sims 5'' or some future game establishes a third continuity; do we still continue to treat the continuity established in the first three games as being the "main" one? I'm simply suggesting that we look to the possible future problems that come up if we deliberately choose to rule one set of events as the "main" set and therefore the proper set, while we treat another set as "alternative." It's a matter of wording and what that wording implies. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 05:05, August 3, 2014 (UTC)
| |||