Forum:Overuse of game era: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Auror Andrachome No edit summary |
imported>Lost Labyrinth No edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::I think it's a useful template, but maybe we should narrrow down the pages it applies to. I think that an era template is perfectly legitimate on say, the 'Potions' article, but not sims and families. 22:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]] ([[User talk:Hurshbr|talk]])Hurshbr |
::I think it's a useful template, but maybe we should narrrow down the pages it applies to. I think that an era template is perfectly legitimate on say, the 'Potions' article, but not sims and families. 22:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]] ([[User talk:Hurshbr|talk]])Hurshbr |
||
:::I think Era can apply to some 'Sim' and 'Family' articles - in the case where they appear in numerous games. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 17:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC) |
:::I think Era can apply to some 'Sim' and 'Family' articles - in the case where they appear in numerous games. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 17:12, May 12, 2013 (UTC) |
||
Eh, if it's defined by an infobox what game(s) the subject is featured in then that's enough exposure. Adding the template to something that we've only seen once is pointless. {{T|Pagecover}} and {{T|Era}} appear to be working in co-operation on some pages but I'm fine either way of which method we use for whatever I didn't mention. {{LabSig}} 21:46, May 13, 2013 (UTC) |
|||