Forum:Phasing out Simbio templates: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Waikikamukow
No edit summary
imported>K6ka
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:


I also think that this is a great idea. However, in regards to articles in the Fanon namespace, would we ask the authors themselves to remove the Simbio template from their page(s), or would community members do it for them? Would this also be the same for abandoned Fanons and Fanons made by retired users? ~ [[User:Waikikamukow|<font color="6a2286">Waikikamukow</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Waikikamukow|<font color="00b0f4">Anyone wanna chat?</font>]])</small> 01:25, December 22, 2015 (UTC)
I also think that this is a great idea. However, in regards to articles in the Fanon namespace, would we ask the authors themselves to remove the Simbio template from their page(s), or would community members do it for them? Would this also be the same for abandoned Fanons and Fanons made by retired users? ~ [[User:Waikikamukow|<font color="6a2286">Waikikamukow</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Waikikamukow|<font color="00b0f4">Anyone wanna chat?</font>]])</small> 01:25, December 22, 2015 (UTC)

:That's a good point to bring up. I personally think Simbio should be kept, just discontinued in the article namespace. This will save us the hassle of dealing with fanons with Simbio, and it seems less bureaucratic than forcing users to give up Simbio. I am very much opposed to any plan that involves "forcing" fanon authors to change something. โ€”[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">๐Ÿ</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] ยท [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 02:14, December 27, 2015 (UTC)