Forum:Proposing an exception to the Notability Policy: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 19:34, 25 June 2015 (edit) imported>K6ka No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:55, 26 June 2015 (edit) (undo) imported>Woganhemlock (→‎Discussion) Newer edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	These are just rough guidelines I made up in less than an hour, so feel free to modify if necessary. --I am [[User:K6ka\|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka\|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka\|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 19:34, June 25, 2015 (UTC)		These are just rough guidelines I made up in less than an hour, so feel free to modify if necessary. --I am [[User:K6ka\|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka\|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka\|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 19:34, June 25, 2015 (UTC)
			:I wouldn't be entirely opposed to making articles for cc and youtube creators but there would need to definitely be some sort of cut-off point. I'm fine with what was suggested above. Alternatively, we could create some sort of list article of cc creators/youtube creators if there isn't enough information on them, as many of the articles might just state who they are and what sort of videos they make with a link or two and might be doomed to be stubs. I wouldn't mind either option. {{WHsig\|01:55, June 26, 2015 (UTC)}}

Navigation menu