Forum:Proposing an exception to the Notability Policy: Difference between revisions

imported>LostInRiverview
imported>Sapphire Moondust
Line 18:
:I wouldn't be entirely opposed to making articles for cc and youtube creators but there would need to definitely be some sort of cut-off point. I'm fine with what was suggested above. Alternatively, we could create some sort of list article of cc creators/youtube creators if there isn't enough information on them, as many of the articles might just state who they are and what sort of videos they make with a link or two and might be doomed to be stubs. I wouldn't mind either option. {{WHsig|01:55, June 26, 2015 (UTC)}}
::Personally I'd rather we add CC and YouTube creators to a list page, rather than give each their own separate page. We could make exceptions in cases where it's warranted, but on the whole I think Wogan's right in that the articles might risk becoming stale. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 03:25, June 26, 2015 (UTC)
 
::I agree with what those who stated their opinions above me have said. I really feel that the CC and YouTube creators should be listed on the same page and not on their own separate articles for the reasons that have been stated above. The articles would be considered stubs and that is always unappealing to see. [[User:S*pphir3 St*rdust|S*pphir3 St*rdust]] ([[User talk:S*pphir3 St*rdust|talk]]) 19:40, July 18, 2015 (UTC)