Anonymous user
Forum:Quick question about fanon additions: Difference between revisions
Forum:Quick question about fanon additions (edit)
Revision as of 05:15, 21 March 2011
, 13 years agono edit summary
imported>MrsCrumplebottom mNo edit summary |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
Line 9:
:: I was going to add the YouTube video into the article anyway but I want to know what is the proper way to do it. The other side of the YouTube question is to write an article about the YouTube Sims Channel, like the Sims 3 Channel and user created channels for The Sims, and the question that I asked could be asked this way, am I allowed to write about a Sims related articles on here without using the fanon namespace or write the article as a fanon namespace article? Sorry for the miscommunication. [[User:MrsCrumplebottom|MrsCrumplebottom]] 23:24, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
:::That's difficult to say; if the channel were run by someone from EA who is on the game design team, then technically videos put on that channel would be canon, wouldn't they (looking for feedback on this)? But if it were just a video channel by a game player, articles based on those videos would be fanon. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 05:15, March 21, 2011 (UTC)
| |||