Forum:Reusing inactive admin policy: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
(new policy) |
imported>K6ka m (Signing comment by 208.87.237.180) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
4. makes people want to be active |
4. makes people want to be active |
||
cons and solutions |
cons and solutions |
||
1. bureaucrats are free - we can report that to wikia staff<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:208.87.237.180|208.87.237.180]] ([[User talk:208.87.237.180|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/208.87.237.180|contribs]]) 17:04, December 19, 2014 (UTC) - [[Help:Signatures|Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]]</small> |
|||
1. bureaucrats are free - we can report that to wikia staff |
|||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
Revision as of 17:07, 19 December 2014
we should use the inactive admin policy because if we don't it will be to any inactive admins and no space for new admins and the inactive admin thesims23 is probably never coming ck. pros of it 1. new spots for admins 2. inactive admins will want to come back 3. makes users want to contribute 4. makes people want to be active cons and solutions 1. bureaucrats are free - we can report that to wikia staff—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.237.180 (talk • contribs) 17:04, December 19, 2014 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~