Anonymous user
Forum:Reusing inactive admin policy: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>LostInRiverview m (LostInRiverview moved page Forum:Reusing inactive aadmin policy to Forum:Reusing inactive admin policy without leaving a redirect: If we're going to be seriously discussing this, we might as well spell the words correctly in the page name) |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
Line 1:
{{Forumheader|Community discussions|archive}}
{{Closed|resolved|The Inactive Admin policy will not be re-adopted. 04:47, January 11, 2015 (UTC)}}
we should use the inactive admin policy because if we don't it will be to any inactive admins and no space for new admins and the inactive admin thesims23 is probably never coming ck.
pros of it
Line 24:
::{{VoteAgainst}} '''Oppose''' - For reasons stated above. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 23:34, December 31, 2014 (UTC)
:::{{VoteAgainst}} '''Oppose''' - per the above. I'd also like to state that this thread was created by an anonymous user with a history of "questionable" contributions and therefore I don't really think that the OP post is exactly aware of the circumstances leading up to our current policy situation. {{WHsig|06:54, January 1, 2015 (UTC)}}
==Resolution==
There has been no activity on this thread in over a week and it's pretty apparent that this idea has a {{WP|WP:SNOWBALL|snowball's chance}} of passing. The conclusion here is that the Inactive Administrator policy will not return at this time. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 04:47, January 11, 2015 (UTC)
| |||