Anonymous user
Forum:Speedy deletion of copycat templates: Difference between revisions
Forum:Speedy deletion of copycat templates (edit)
Revision as of 00:25, 22 August 2018
, 5 years agono edit summary
imported>SimDestroyer No edit summary |
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
||
Line 6:
Thoughts? -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LostInRiverview</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 16:18, August 21, 2018 (UTC)
:I completely '''support''' this. Those types of templates have been seen as an annoyance and just deleting them without having to go through an unnecessary deletion discussion is great. There's going to be more of these in the future anyways. - [[User:SimDestroyer|SimDestroyer]] ([[User talk:SimDestroyer|talk]]) 17:05, August 21, 2018 (UTC)
'''YES'''. I've had enough of these templates being created, and even more annoyed when somehow people start using them. I don't know what is to blame here, <s>Wikia's</s> <small>(oops, "FANDOM!")</small> editing tools that seem to favour infoboxes using the Portable Infobox markup (even if in reality such templates are complete trash) or seemingly human tendencies to go out of one's way to do the ''wrong, non-obvious'' thing. I completely support creating a separate speedy deletion criteria for this, perhaps a '''T3. Poorly created alternative to existing template''' or something of the like. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 00:25, August 22, 2018 (UTC)
| |||