Forum:Voting system and reasoning: Difference between revisions
imported>RoseGui No edit summary |
imported>RoseGui No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
With the creation of these two different sections, comments like the former could be avoided, as "reasoning" implies actual arguments: users' efficiency; how they could benefit from the tools; traits like being helful, caring; etc. Also, I'm terribly sorry for creating a separate thread for this when there is "Adressing issues with rights requests", but the page is very long and I'm not sure what the outcome was and how the system changed and if someone could sum it up and explain it to me, I would be grateful; and maybe this whole discussion I started wouldn't be needed. --[[User:RoseGui|<span style="color:#FF0038">RoseGui</span><span style="color:#DE3163"><sup>✿</sup></span>]] <sup> <small>([[User talk:RoseGui|<span style="color:#BE0032">talk</span>]])</small></sup> 07:12, July 10, 2013 (UTC) |
With the creation of these two different sections, comments like the former could be avoided, as "reasoning" implies actual arguments: users' efficiency; how they could benefit from the tools; traits like being helful, caring; etc. Also, I'm terribly sorry for creating a separate thread for this when there is "Adressing issues with rights requests", but the page is very long and I'm not sure what the outcome was and how the system changed and if someone could sum it up and explain it to me, I would be grateful; and maybe this whole discussion I started wouldn't be needed. --[[User:RoseGui|<span style="color:#FF0038">RoseGui</span><span style="color:#DE3163"><sup>✿</sup></span>]] <sup> <small>([[User talk:RoseGui|<span style="color:#BE0032">talk</span>]])</small></sup> 07:12, July 10, 2013 (UTC) |
||
==Discussion== |
|||
Revision as of 07:13, 10 July 2013
Okay, so, based on what happened Beds's second nomination and two forum posts I would like to propose some other solution.
In my opinion, votes like "the user deserves these/those/that rights" are baseless and are not a valid argument to vote. So, what I very briefly suggest is that we create in RfA's and probably RfB's two sections: one for voting, another for reasoning.
With the creation of these two different sections, comments like the former could be avoided, as "reasoning" implies actual arguments: users' efficiency; how they could benefit from the tools; traits like being helful, caring; etc. Also, I'm terribly sorry for creating a separate thread for this when there is "Adressing issues with rights requests", but the page is very long and I'm not sure what the outcome was and how the system changed and if someone could sum it up and explain it to me, I would be grateful; and maybe this whole discussion I started wouldn't be needed. --RoseGui✿ (talk) 07:12, July 10, 2013 (UTC)