Game guide talk:Avoiding corruption: Difference between revisions

imported>K6ka
imported>Laurabcn
Line 83:
::I see, after looking at the history page, that several people have edited out the shampoo bit only for it to be put back in. Sources have even been added to support that statement - but isn't that missing the point? These really look out of place in an article that is about ''the sims games. ''Since it's so controversial and beyond the scope of this wiki, shouldn't we just agree to delete it and find something else to use as an example? It sure seems better to me than turning this into an argument. [[User:Laurabcn|Laurabcn]] ([[User talk:Laurabcn|talk]]) 14:20, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
 
:::What other examples do you have in mind, then? Having an outside analogy isn't necessarily harmful, and if it helps readers understand, that's a good thing. Just because we are a wiki about ''The Sims'' series doesn't necessarily mean we can't make connections to other non-Sims related material. --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 15:34, April 8, 2015 (UTC) 
:::    
:::        Agreed! But I think we're going too far if we include references to support that outside analogy: it should be something more obvious. I'm not very inspired myself, but maybe expand the virus analogy somehow and leave it at that? Although we might want to think of something to keep that "prompting you to use it again and again" line... Sorry to be so unhelpful, but I really can't think of any way to phrase it right now. [[User:Laurabcn|Laurabcn]] ([[User talk:Laurabcn|talk]]) 17:28, April 8, 2015 (UTC)
 
==Deleting unused custom skin/eyes==
Anonymous user