Talk:Aspiration benefit: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Nikel23
No edit summary
imported>Dharden
Line 8: Line 8:


So my question is... Should we reword the statement, or is it clear already? [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] <sub>–</sub> [[The Sims Wiki:Featured Media/Voting|<span style="color:red ; text-shadow:#E97451 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Vote!''</sub></span>]] 12:57, March 9, 2013 (UTC)
So my question is... Should we reword the statement, or is it clear already? [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] <sub>–</sub> [[The Sims Wiki:Featured Media/Voting|<span style="color:red ; text-shadow:#E97451 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Vote!''</sub></span>]] 12:57, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

:I think it's clear enough for the time being. I'll look at it again after I've had some coffee. Still early AM here. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 13:16, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:16, 9 March 2013

Since Business Perks and Vacation Benefits aren't written in description but instead, written with its own words, each of the benefit here must be rewritten as well. Nikel Talk 11:11, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Actually, it looks like Vacation benefits are written as descriptions. Business perks aren't, but each track has its own page in which they are. I think we can leave it as it is. Dharden (talk) 15:54, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
Whoops. I should've checked before I talked. Hmm... probably I was just daydreaming... Sorry, then I'll leave it as it is. Nikel Talk 02:50, January 23, 2012 (UTC)

Clarify?

I don't remember for sure, but I think I was the one who wrote about the animation of abduction with Astrowonder Telescope. I guess I interpreted it wrong, but the way I read it, it states that the animation of the Sim during an abduction will not play if they use that telescope. What I was saying is that the object animation itself will not play, as in pulled up and down; that telescope will stay static/frozen, unlike Farstar e3, which has an object animation (being pulled up and down by the Sim).

So my question is... Should we reword the statement, or is it clear already? Nikel Talk Vote! 12:57, March 9, 2013 (UTC)

I think it's clear enough for the time being. I'll look at it again after I've had some coffee. Still early AM here. Dharden (talk) 13:16, March 9, 2013 (UTC)