Talk:Boat: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
imported>Waikikamukow (→Split) |
||
Line 4:
::When there's enough information for each page to not be a stub, I support a split! ~ [[User:Waikikamukow|<font color="6a2286">Waikikamukow</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Waikikamukow|<font color="00b0f4">Anyone wanna chat?</font>]])</small> 01:04, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
:::If it were split now, it would be a stub page. But, as it is, it's a short section anyways. So either way it's missing information. My opinion is, if we agree that it should be its own page, then whether we do it now or wait until more information is added is really irrelevant, since we agree that it should be its own page. So I support moving it now and just saving a step later on. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 17:56, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
::::Sounds good. ~ [[User:Waikikamukow|<font color="6a2286">Waikikamukow</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Waikikamukow|<font color="00b0f4">Anyone wanna chat?</font>]])</small> 23:15, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 23:15, 3 July 2013
Split
Houseboats and boats are entirely different things - physical and technical. I say a split is necessary, but maybe not at the moment because there's still little information that it provides. It can be improved anytime though. Nikel Talk – Vote! 16:05, June 27, 2013 (UTC)
- I agree that the section should be split off into its own page. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 00:08, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
- When there's enough information for each page to not be a stub, I support a split! ~ Waikikamukow (Anyone wanna chat?) 01:04, July 1, 2013 (UTC)
- If it were split now, it would be a stub page. But, as it is, it's a short section anyways. So either way it's missing information. My opinion is, if we agree that it should be its own page, then whether we do it now or wait until more information is added is really irrelevant, since we agree that it should be its own page. So I support moving it now and just saving a step later on. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 17:56, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Sounds good. ~ Waikikamukow (Anyone wanna chat?) 23:15, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
- If it were split now, it would be a stub page. But, as it is, it's a short section anyways. So either way it's missing information. My opinion is, if we agree that it should be its own page, then whether we do it now or wait until more information is added is really irrelevant, since we agree that it should be its own page. So I support moving it now and just saving a step later on. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 17:56, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
- When there's enough information for each page to not be a stub, I support a split! ~ Waikikamukow (Anyone wanna chat?) 01:04, July 1, 2013 (UTC)