Anonymous user
Talk:Journalism: Difference between revisions
→Investigatory Jornalist vs Investigative Journalist
imported>Icemandeaf (→Investigatory Jornalist vs Investigative Journalist: new section) |
imported>Dharden |
||
Line 12:
Not wanting to start ab edit war here, but I disagree with the sic placed on Investigatory Journalist. While I don't profess to be in that field, I have several connections with those in the field. They tell me that all journalist should be investigative because they have to make sure their stories are supported by facts; however, an investigatory journalist is one who looks for the scandals and other claimed wrongdoings without always having to have truthful facts, a whistle blower or leak journalist are other like terms. So that basically means that while all journalists should be investigative, it doesn't mean that they are necessarily investigatory. – [[User:Icemandeaf|Icemandeaf]] ([[User talk:Icemandeaf|talk]]) 21:25, December 12, 2016 (UTC)
:I support the {{T|sic}} because even if the use of "[[Wiktionary:investigatory|investigatory]]" ''wasn't'' a Maxian goof, "investigatory journalist" is uncommon enough to look wrong in that context. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 05:03, December 13, 2016 (UTC)
| |||