Talk:Same-sex relationship: Difference between revisions

Forgot to log in
imported>Auror Andrachome
(Forgot to log in)
Line 112:
:::But what is the point in finding it offensive? This message was only meant to ensure readers were knowing what they were reading. I actually find this thread to be very familiar to [http://www.ign.com/articles/2012/10/08/modern-warfare-2-map-removed-following-controversy this].
::::This is exactly the point: There is no need to "ensure readers know what they are reading", because there is nothing wrong with same-sex relationships between Sims in ''The Sims'' series. And again, the title of the article is very clear. [[User:GuyB1|GuyB1]] • [[User_talk:GuyB1|Talk]] 01:22, October 11, 2012 (UTC)
:::::That wasn't the point at all. Perhaps you should start looking at other point of views with a more [[perceptive]] eye. [[Special:Contributions/24There may be nothing wrong with same-sex relationships, but there are still those that don't believe in sexual equality.99 This wiki was always meant to be neutral - cater to all users.25 We can't just go with one opinion because it might be right.56 But what benefit do we get out of removing one sign from an article casual "Simmers" may read? An applause from GLAAD? Ha! [[User:Auror Andrachome|24.99.25.56Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:24.99.25.56Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 20:2531, October 12, 2012 (UTC)
 
==Merge proposal==