Talk:Titania Summerdream

I'm not sure the whole Sims 3 paragraph we 'are not supposed to deface of modify' (...) has it's place on the article, as it deals with some personal (and rather mean) thought of an user. And the fact that Setit grants himself property over the page is not really pleasant. JM9193 (talk) 10:25, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the section and contacted Setit to let them know about this. Thank you for pointing out, JM9193. :) --RoseGui (talk here) 10:41, September 7, 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. In The Sims 3, she has commitment issues YET she is a family person in The Sims 2, happily living with her husband and adopted children. Also, in The Sims 2, her nice and playful level is at 7 but she is a grumpy sim in The Sims 3. Her outgoing level is 6 in The Sims 2, yet she is a loner in The Sims 3.

The only thing that's accurate is the neatness level. In The Sims 2, it's only 3, in The Sims 3, she's a slob.

CountDon (talk) 06:08, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

Geez, that's why I hate EA when they decided to reintroduce Sims from the prequels, but always forgot the details. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 06:12, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

Replied

Earlier this week; I contributed a section that discussed the origins of Titania in Shakespeare's play "A Midsummer Night's Dream". My section contrasted the heroic and positive character of the traditional Titania, Faerie Queen and EA's negative and degrading interpretayion of Titania Summerdream. I am disappointed to see that SOMEONE has arbirtarily removed the entire section which I added to this article. It was evidently very on topic and very relevant. Since I do not see a request to remove it, there is no reason why you have should done so other than diciatorial authoritarianism. Wikis are usually run democratically; with participation, cooperation and respect. Deleting my contribution is very destructive and hostile and in conflilct with the principles behind wiki projects: ThereforeI would like the person to replace my contribution and to give a vilid reason for why he removed it. He cn not remove it merely because it criticized EA or because he did not like it.. i wonder if the person who deleted it works for EA and is trying to protect EA's image. This would clearly present a conflict of interest and such a person shud withdraw from this project or set it up as a commercial or private site.

In reply to the person who said I was mean, if you only want positve things on this wiki, then it is nothing more than advertisement for EA and not an independent project. I can not see how discribing the character of Titania in Western culture can be interpreted as mean. In response to the person who thinks that I took control over the entire article. This is not true; I merely asked that the section I contributed not be deleted, which was brutally disregarded in any case. Making this request did not mean that I claimed control over the article.

I find the quality of this wiki to be very low if anyone can remove whatever he chooses whenever he chooses without stating a clear reason or consulting others. Additonally, the person who removed my contribution claimed that he contacted me. This is not true - I have never received any lmessage from the person who the deleted the article Howeer; since you wish to behave in this way, may you will also receive this same treatment in the future. May you also become victim to totalitarian authority. What comes around goes aroundSetit (talk) 08:34, September 13, 2012 (UTC)

The problem with your squib of EA is that it was misplaced. The main article is not supposed to contain critics, praises or personal thoughts about anything, it is just meant to describe objectively. Your own descrpitions should have been placed on this talk page, or you could have written an user blog and this wouldn't have caused any problem. However, the informations about Titania's role in Sheakspeare's A Midsummer Night's dream could have been partially left on the main page, after removing the subjective informations.

The other problem with your edits was this: "This subarticle added by Setit - please do not deface or modify. Thanks. " The main space articles do not belong to anyone. JM9193 (talk) 09:15, September 13, 2012 (UTC)