The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Template:Standard Sim: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Acherontia Styx
No edit summary
imported>LostInRiverview
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PfD header|1={{t|Standard Sim}}}}<!--- Add the page(s) nominated for deletion behind the "1=" in the template above. For example: {{PfD header|1=Bella Goth}}--->
{{PfD header|1=Template:Standard Sim|2=Speedy Delete}}<!--- Add the page(s) nominated for deletion behind the "1=" in the template above. For example: {{PfD header|1=Bella Goth}}--->
==Nomination==
==Nomination==
<!--- Give a brief explanation of why this article is being nominated for deletion. Be sure to sign the post using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) -->
<!--- Give a brief explanation of why this article is being nominated for deletion. Be sure to sign the post using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) -->
Line 7: Line 7:


This template also just has that ugly "outdated" look. As for that fanon user, he appears to have come over from the Spanish-speaking SimsPedia [http://es.sims.wikia.com/wiki/Muro:RCS_Sims], and he uses the very same template on his fanon pages over there. I would say yes to deletion, especially since that user can simply learn to use the typical templates that other fanon users use for The Sims 3 fanon. [[User:Acherontia Styx|Acherontia Styx]] ([[User talk:Acherontia Styx|talk]]) 09:34, August 22, 2018 (UTC)
This template also just has that ugly "outdated" look. As for that fanon user, he appears to have come over from the Spanish-speaking SimsPedia [http://es.sims.wikia.com/wiki/Muro:RCS_Sims], and he uses the very same template on his fanon pages over there. I would say yes to deletion, especially since that user can simply learn to use the typical templates that other fanon users use for The Sims 3 fanon. [[User:Acherontia Styx|Acherontia Styx]] ([[User talk:Acherontia Styx|talk]]) 09:34, August 22, 2018 (UTC)

----
The [[The Sims Wiki:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]] was recently amended based on [[Forum:Speedy deletion of copycat templates|a community discussion]], and this template met the newly-added speedy delete criterion; "15. Poorly-designed alternatives to existing templates." As a result, the template has been deleted. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LostInRiverview</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 03:49, October 9, 2018 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:49, 9 October 2018

← Pages for Deletion | ← Past deletion discussions

Pages for Deletion → Template:Standard Sim
This is an archive of a resolved deletion discussion. Please do not edit the contents of this page.

Page(s) for deletion: Template:Standard Sim

Outcome of discussion: The page(s) nominated met criteria for speedy deletion and were deleted without discussion.

Nomination[edit source]

This template was nominated for deletion a little over a week ago but a discussion about deletion wasn't started. Now it appears that a fanon page has now been created that uses this template, which complicates matters a little bit. That being said, this definitely falls under the umbrella of a "copycat template," in line with several other Infobox Markup-based templates we've deleted over the past few months on the wiki. I think this one, like the others, should be deleted. - LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 03:08, August 22, 2018 (UTC)


This template also just has that ugly "outdated" look. As for that fanon user, he appears to have come over from the Spanish-speaking SimsPedia [1], and he uses the very same template on his fanon pages over there. I would say yes to deletion, especially since that user can simply learn to use the typical templates that other fanon users use for The Sims 3 fanon. Acherontia Styx (talk) 09:34, August 22, 2018 (UTC)


The criteria for speedy deletion was recently amended based on a community discussion, and this template met the newly-added speedy delete criterion; "15. Poorly-designed alternatives to existing templates." As a result, the template has been deleted. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 03:49, October 9, 2018 (UTC)