The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Auror Andrachome |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
| Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
::::'''Firstly''', my post was solely to show my support for [[User:HanaGoth96|HanaGoth96]]. Suggesting anything else, such as throwing out accusations or belittling others was not meant to be done, but seeing the post-passage written by you two, I don't feel too sorry for having typed it. Perhaps there is an undertone I'm not aware of that should be brought up elsewhere? My partition about "activity" was meant for myself as well, so don't get so rash. I brought up my points because that is where Hana stood out most and I was simply commenting on them. If you saw something else, then that's a fault on your part. Lab, I know full well what administratorship is and isn't. If you hadn't already been aware, I've been blocked four times, yet still an admin today. If you feel I don't deserve it, then the admins can discuss about revoking my rights while I stand in as admin pro tempore. |
::::'''Firstly''', my post was solely to show my support for [[User:HanaGoth96|HanaGoth96]]. Suggesting anything else, such as throwing out accusations or belittling others was not meant to be done, but seeing the post-passage written by you two, I don't feel too sorry for having typed it. Perhaps there is an undertone I'm not aware of that should be brought up elsewhere? My partition about "activity" was meant for myself as well, so don't get so rash. I brought up my points because that is where Hana stood out most and I was simply commenting on them. If you saw something else, then that's a fault on your part. Lab, I know full well what administratorship is and isn't. If you hadn't already been aware, I've been blocked four times, yet still an admin today. If you feel I don't deserve it, then the admins can discuss about revoking my rights while I stand in as admin pro tempore. |
||
::::On another note, it seems I've forgotten when the definition for "majority" seems to have changed. Providing four active admins doesn't make the whole team active. The whole "hypocrite" argument is also dead as I've already mentioned that I included myself with the "inactive admin" clip. And really, striking my vote because of what I retorted is bad faith? Yeah, I'm throwing an accusation of bias at you, good sir. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 22:18, May 9, 2013 (UTC) |
::::On another note, it seems I've forgotten when the definition for "majority" seems to have changed. Providing four active admins doesn't make the whole team active. The whole "hypocrite" argument is also dead as I've already mentioned that I included myself with the "inactive admin" clip. And really, striking my vote because of what I retorted is bad faith? Yeah, I'm throwing an accusation of bias at you, good sir. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 22:18, May 9, 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::::This is the last thing I'm saying on this matter, so read carefully because I'm not going to repeat it. |
|||
:::::While you obviously came here to make a support vote, a comment you made was clearly taken negatively. If it wasn't your intention to undermine other users based on activity or "caring" about the wiki then fair enough but maybe you should learn from this and maybe try to word your argument a bit better. As for the "hypocrite" thing, you didn't initially bring yourself under that argument as you suggested, only after I gave examples of administrators voting on this RfA. I only placed you as a subject of your argument in a manner of questioning your argument and the integrity of it, nothing more. You clearly don't sound like you're taking this seriously enough after claiming you're not "too sorry for having typed it" ("it" referring to your activity/caring accusation), which can honestly be taken as bad faith given that it was already made clear that your statement/accusation was taken offensively and it seems you've gone and thrown another baseless accusation of bias at me, despite already stating I wasn't acting biased with regards to the RfA and despite overturning my decision to preserve neutrality. I can understand if you're annoyed right now but you entered this situation on your own and you acted by your own accord. I'm extremely disappointed with how you've acted through all of this, because I know you know better but it seems you don't want to show it. |
|||
:::::I've now answered every possible question about this and debunked every argument that anybody could possibly come up with. I'm done with this subject in its entirety and I don't want to see any more commentary on this. {{LabSig}} 22:51, May 9, 2013 (UTC) |
|||
==== Conclusion ==== |
==== Conclusion ==== |
||