The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship: Difference between revisions

imported>ColinThePanda
imported>Lost Labyrinth
Line 96:
:I understand that I do tend to take criticism a little too hard and that I do tend to get into disagreements and quarrels with other users, but I can also keep myself calm and I would really like the chance to prove to you that I do have what it takes to be an admin. [[User:HanaGoth96|<font color="violet">'''HanaGoth96'''</font>]] ([[User_talk:HanaGoth96|<small text>'''Neigh'''</small>]]) 18:57, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
::I guess for the sake of clarity and fairness to you, I'm going to come out and formally '''oppose''' this nomination. Actions speak louder than words, and there's no real way to prove that you've changed except through demonstration, which would be difficult to do in an RfA. It's not fair to you to expect you to try and demonstrate that to gain my support (although my support is only one vote). And, with all due respect, the time you have to prove that you're ready to be an administrator is before you apply to be one. My only advice is to take those faults you acknowledge and try to improve them, and apply later. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 04:18, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
*{{VoteFor}}'''Strong Support''' - I think that HanaGoth deserves to have admin rights. Being an active user for just 3 and a half months, she has a very impressive edit count consisting of many main content edits, along with a strong history of reverting vandalism. I assure you that Hana only has the best intentions. [[User:Cavia porcellus|<font face="candara" size="3"><span style="color:turquoise;">'''Cavia'''</span></font>]] <small>(<font face="candara">[[User_talk:Cavia porcellus|<span style="color:lime;">'''wheek'''</span>]] • </font> <font face="candara">[[User_blog:Cavia porcellus|<span style="color:pink;">'''speak'''</span>]]</font>)</small> 19:32, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
 
:{{Neutral}} '''Neutral''' - I don't doubt that Hana has admin potential; the skill and good intentions are clearly there. However, given the points that have been raised, I'm not sure she is ready for it yet, though I am still open on that matter. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 12:44, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
::{{VoteFor}} '''Support''' - Hana is a great editor. Recently she may have been inappropriate but her behaviour has improved immensly. I really do think she is cut out for becoming an admin, she plans out everything. Heck, she's even been planning this request for weeks. Hana really deserves this, I'm sure she'd make a great job of it, but just a bit of advice for Hana, sometimes you just need to keep your calm. {{ColinSig|15:57, May 3, 2013 (UTC)}}
:::{{VoteAgainst}}'''Oppose''' - I'm not convinced at this time that you possess the mindset of an administrator and I'm worried, based on your tendency to overreact, that you'll make poor decisions with the admin tools. As LiR said, addressing these flaws should really be done ''before'' posting an RfA and I will safely say that you do have potential and everything else is sound, so don't be too disheartened by this. {{LabSig}} 17:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
 
== Closed requests ==