Anonymous user
The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Lost Labyrinth (→HanaGoth96: I'll probably get moaned at for this later...) |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
Line 73:
Reason for request/nomination here. ~~~~
-->
== Closed requests ==
===[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]]===▼
{{userlinks|Hurshbr}}▼
I would like to recieve sysop rights because I feel like I could help with at least minor bugs on The Sims Wiki. I would like to help organize stuff and just help out around the wiki. I would participate in fanon administration, image and file maintenance, and parts of community development. If you do not think I am prepared for this, please feel free to say so. I would try to keep good faith and keep calm, and I would try to keep on top of my duties despite my slight scatter-brainness. I would also try to help this wiki stay in shape to the best of my ability.23:32, May 3, 2013 (UTC)[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]] ([[User talk:Hurshbr|talk]]) 23:32, May 3, 2013 (UTC)Hurshbr▼
====Consensus on Hurshbr====▼
:''This period of consensus will last for one week. Time remaining: {{Countdown|time=23:32 May 10, 2013|zone=UTC}}.''▼
----▼
{{VoteAgainst}} - ''Not Yet'' - You only just received rollback rights a couple weeks ago, and I'd feel more comfortable supporting you if you had a little more experience using that tool. Also, and while this isn't a definite mark against you, your mainspace edits are quite sparse. Since you're applying for fanon admin it's not a huge thing, but I'd encourage you, in either case, to become more familar with the main namespace. So, all in all, I am not supporting this request ''at this time''. You do good work in the fanon namespace - keep it up! - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 00:25, May 4, 2013 (UTC)▼
:{{VoteAgainst}} - '''Not Yet''' - per above {{WHsig|01:15, May 4, 2013 (UTC)}}▼
::{{VoteAgainst}} - '''Not Yet''' - Agreed with LiR. I think you need a bit more experience with managing the fanon namespace as a whole (including marking other users' fanon for cleanup, improving mistakes on other pages, etc.), but definitely don't let this discourage you. You're going down the right road and as long as you meet the conditions I've listed, I'll likely support in the future. —[[User:Random Ranaun|<font color="#008000">Random Ranaun</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Random Ranaun|<font color="#006400">Talk to me!</font>]])</sup> 01:27, May 4, 2013 (UTC)▼
:::{{VoteAgainst}}'''Not yet''' - Per above. Just keep doing what you're doing and gain some experience with the rollback tool and you'll maybe get there next time. {{LabSig}} 11:02, May 4, 2013 (UTC)▼
::::Voting on this appears to have dried up, and it appears that the current consensus of "Not Yet" would be difficult to overcome. Therefore, I am calling this early, and '''declining''' the request at this time. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 15:38, May 7, 2013 (UTC)▼
===[[User:HanaGoth96|HanaGoth96]]===
Line 84 ⟶ 102:
====Consensus on HanaGoth96====
:''This period of consensus will last for one week.
----
'''Question''' - I'm curious - you were nominated for admin less than a week ago, but you chose to turn it down; why? -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:08, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
Line 127 ⟶ 145:
:::::::::{{VoteFor}} '''Support'''- Hana, from what I have seen, is what one might call a peacekeeper; she works to make sure that everything is alright and enforces the rules when she sees something astray from the norm. She is a promising editor and has always spoken to me positively. I, for one, think she deserves these rights. She may have only been here for a few months, but it is not how long she has been here that determines the quality of her edits but what she has done with the said time that makes all the difference. Hana is deserving of these rights and I fully '''support''' her. {{PGRSig}} 03:55, May 5, 2013 (UTC)
::::::::::<s>{{VoteFor}}'''Full Support''' - Both parties have made interesting statements that have compelled me to vote in the way I did. The opposing arguments do make a few fair points, but most are redundant and a bit pointless to continue instigating. You're actively editing (which '''cannot''' be said for most of the admins voting on this nomination) and you genuinely care about the wiki. Your fervor for the wiki is strong and your heart is in the right place. Long live The Sims! [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 23:33, May 8, 2013 (UTC)</s> Vote striked due to the only argument being deemed below as rude, completely false and not representative whatsoever of the nominee. Invalid. {{LabSig}} 11:42, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
:::::::::::{{VoteAgainst}}'''Weak Oppose - '''Sorry Hana, while you are a great editor, some of the stuff I've seen tells me you're not quite read to be an admin. Do this again in a month or 2, and you'll mostly likely be ready.
==== Comments/Questions ====
Line 142 ⟶ 160:
::I'm not expecting my decision to go without controversy and if anybody does wish to complain then come on by to IRC and we can discuss this thoroughly and amicably. I'm now going to distance myself from this RfA to avoid any conflicts of interest with regards to my opposition vote. I do hope that in the future, those supporting an RfA will put more emphasis on the candidate's suitability for the role rather than personal ties, which, as LiR once again stated, appears to be most (though not all) of the support votes (oh and before somebody throws this at me, Auror's vote was striked due to the bad faith assertion of her argument with regards to other users, if I was camping on support votes then I would have striked the "she deserves this" votes too). {{LabSig}} 11:42, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
====
The time to vote has expired. There is no conclusion yet. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:08, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
▲===[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]]===
▲{{userlinks|Hurshbr}}
▲I would like to recieve sysop rights because I feel like I could help with at least minor bugs on The Sims Wiki. I would like to help organize stuff and just help out around the wiki. I would participate in fanon administration, image and file maintenance, and parts of community development. If you do not think I am prepared for this, please feel free to say so. I would try to keep good faith and keep calm, and I would try to keep on top of my duties despite my slight scatter-brainness. I would also try to help this wiki stay in shape to the best of my ability.23:32, May 3, 2013 (UTC)[[User:Hurshbr|Hurshbr]] ([[User talk:Hurshbr|talk]]) 23:32, May 3, 2013 (UTC)Hurshbr
▲====Consensus on Hurshbr====
▲:''This period of consensus will last for one week. Time remaining: {{Countdown|time=23:32 May 10, 2013|zone=UTC}}.''
▲----
▲{{VoteAgainst}} - ''Not Yet'' - You only just received rollback rights a couple weeks ago, and I'd feel more comfortable supporting you if you had a little more experience using that tool. Also, and while this isn't a definite mark against you, your mainspace edits are quite sparse. Since you're applying for fanon admin it's not a huge thing, but I'd encourage you, in either case, to become more familar with the main namespace. So, all in all, I am not supporting this request ''at this time''. You do good work in the fanon namespace - keep it up! - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 00:25, May 4, 2013 (UTC)
▲:{{VoteAgainst}} - '''Not Yet''' - per above {{WHsig|01:15, May 4, 2013 (UTC)}}
▲::{{VoteAgainst}} - '''Not Yet''' - Agreed with LiR. I think you need a bit more experience with managing the fanon namespace as a whole (including marking other users' fanon for cleanup, improving mistakes on other pages, etc.), but definitely don't let this discourage you. You're going down the right road and as long as you meet the conditions I've listed, I'll likely support in the future. —[[User:Random Ranaun|<font color="#008000">Random Ranaun</font>]] <sup>([[User talk:Random Ranaun|<font color="#006400">Talk to me!</font>]])</sup> 01:27, May 4, 2013 (UTC)
▲:::{{VoteAgainst}}'''Not yet''' - Per above. Just keep doing what you're doing and gain some experience with the rollback tool and you'll maybe get there next time. {{LabSig}} 11:02, May 4, 2013 (UTC)
▲::::Voting on this appears to have dried up, and it appears that the current consensus of "Not Yet" would be difficult to overcome. Therefore, I am calling this early, and '''declining''' the request at this time. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 15:38, May 7, 2013 (UTC)
| |||