Anonymous user
The Sims Wiki talk:Admin Portal: Difference between revisions
m
Closing a few old discussions, as they already seem to be de-facto closed.
imported>C.Syde65 m (Archiving 5 discussions that have been closed.) |
imported>C.Syde65 m (Closing a few old discussions, as they already seem to be de-facto closed.) |
||
Line 11:
==[[User:EmiEm64]] / [[User:Snauspi]]==
{{Closed|res|2=Old news. Neither of these accounts have edited in over a year anyway. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 02:10, August 5, 2016 (UTC)}}
Both these accounts are operated by the same person. I have not blocked either account because the account owner is not trying to disguise the connection, and the account owner has not acted in bad faith. I have advised the account owner via EmiEm64's talk page of our rule against sock puppetry, and await a response. If there is no response, we'll have to figure out how we want to proceed. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 19:10, March 4, 2015 (UTC)
Line 51 ⟶ 52:
=={{User|UndeadEuan}} & {{User|Euan Del Rey}}==
{{Closed|res|2=The UndeadEuan account hasn't edited since they acknowledged the wiki's sock-puppet policy. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 02:10, August 5, 2016 (UTC)}}
These two users have exactly the same avatar, and visit some of the same wikis. Both accounts joined TSW quite some time ago, so I'm surprised this wasn't noticed. I believe that one of the accounts is a sock of the other. As with AlexConnorBrown and VonBraun, I recommend a soft block to one of the accounts, preferably UndeadEuan, as EDR is probably the one this user wishes to use in future. ―'''[[User:WikiBuilder1147|<font color="green">The</font>]] [[Message Wall:WikiBuilder1147|<font color="blue">Tim</font>]] [[User blog:WikiBuilder1147|<font color="lime">Man</font>]]''' <sup>([http://historyfiction.wikia.com/wiki/User:WikiBuilder1147 Infinite Histories] • [http://galactic-crucibles.wikia.com/wiki/User:WikiBuilder1147 Galactic Crucibles] • [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/User:WikiBuilder1147 The Sims Wiki] • [http://hallows-maleficent.wikia.com/wiki/User:WikiBuilder1147 Hallows Maleficent] • '''[[Special:Contributions/WikiBuilder1147|<font color="#006400">Why I'm here in the first place</font>]])'''</sup> 12:38, April 6, 2015 (UTC)
:Left messages on both talk pages, we'll see what they choose to do. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 14:09, April 6, 2015 (UTC)
Line 116 ⟶ 118:
==Block on [[User:BucktonyII|BucktonyII]]==
{{Closed|res|2=Both accounts have been globally disabled. Issue can be brought up again if necessary, since this user has remained disruptive as of recently. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 02:10, August 5, 2016 (UTC)}}
{{Userlinks|BucktonyII}} was blocked indefinitely for adding fanon to canon articles, for which they have been warned in the past. I don't want to second-guess K6ka's judgment here, but I'm curious as to why he decided to issue an indefinite block even though the user had only been [[Special:Log/block?page=User%3ABucktonyII|blocked once before]] (for three days). My concern is that in this case an indefinite block might be premature. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 02:08, August 24, 2015 (UTC)
Line 121 ⟶ 124:
::Okay, I think that's a good reason. I concur with the block, provided they're allowed to appeal (they currently have talk page access, so for the moment, they do have the ability to appeal). - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 02:30, August 24, 2015 (UTC)
==
{{Closed|res|2=Account has been globally blocked. User has not attempted to evade any more blocks in over a year. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 02:10, August 5, 2016 (UTC)}}
I've had a couple of users who have contacted me about EPICSIMSPLAYER who was blocked by Wikia. They attested that the account had been hacked by another sockpuppet/disruptive user, which is why the account was blocked. I must admit that it does seem that couple be a strong possibility; however, it is not possible for us to lift the ban on EPICSIMSPLAYER since Wikia issued the block. The users who contacted me have been trying to contact Wikia to lift the ban without any success, so they have asked if the ban on [[User:Ilovemondler|Ilovemondler]] may be lifted or at least the talk page so the user can make the request directly. I am not exactly sure what is the best approach for this matter. What do you all say? -- [[User:Icemandeaf|Icemandeaf]] ([[User talk:Icemandeaf|talk]]) 15:40, August 30, 2015 (UTC)
:If I remember correctly, this Ilovemondler user was not very efficent when it came to their edits. They're a suspected sockpuppet of ILS5 and to be frankly honest, I think we're doing quite fine without ILS5 running around, causing havoc and making some mess. I '''strongly oppose''' to this user being unblocked. Furthermore, a CheckUser further confirms that they are just as suspicious as ILS5. ~ [[User:Beds|<font color="purple">'''Beds'''</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Beds|<font color="#66CDAA">'''talk'''</font>]] - [[User_blog:Beds|<font color="#66CDAA">'''blog'''</font>]])</sup> 17:11, August 30, 2015 (UTC)
| |||