The Sims Wiki talk:Development Portal/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

m
Robot: Changing template: GGsig
imported>LostInRiverview
(Created page with '{{Archive}} == New playability types == I've added <code>Downtownie</code> and <code>Foreign townie</code> as acceptable values for the <code>play</code> parameter in infoboxes...')
 
imported>Bawt
m (Robot: Changing template: GGsig)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
{{Archivearchive|t}}
 
== New playability types ==
Line 190:
Wendy
 
I have bolded the parts that are relevant to this wiki. To make the navigattion bar look tidier, we need to remove one menu. Which menu should we remove in order to fix the navigation bar? {{GGsigLabSig}} 06:12, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
:I noticed how it says Content A-Z on one of the titles. Perhaps we should try making it just content.--'''[[User:Woganhemlock|<font face="Trebuchet MS" color="black">W</font>]][[User_blog:Woganhemlock|<font color="orange">H</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Woganhemlock|<font color="grey">(Talk)</font>]]</sup>''' 09:08, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
::Just was trying to work it out on my test wiki. I have made up two different possible MediaWiki pages, located [http://woganhemlockstest.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki_A here] and [http://woganhemlockstest.wikia.com/wiki/MediaWiki_B here]. They both work without any issues, as I have tested them. --'''[[User:Woganhemlock|<font face="Trebuchet MS" color="black">W</font>]][[User_blog:Woganhemlock|<font color="orange">H</font>]] <sup>[[User_talk:Woganhemlock|<font color="grey">(Talk)</font>]]</sup>''' 09:21, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
:::MediaWiki A has caused the same issue as it seems to be a copy of the original source. Currently, the nav bar looks fine as it is using the MediaWiki B code. It seems to be that the word, "Administration" was causing the issues. For now, I have changed that to admin but if anyone can think of a better word, feel free to either post it here or update it yourself. {{GGsigLabSig}} 16:13, May 26, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Era Template ==
Line 244:
 
What's needed is an assessment of the template; we should figure out where, either in the template design or in the wiki's css, the problem is located and why it affects different browsers differently. We should then correct these issues so that it can be used in all browsers without worry. In the meantime, I'm suggesting that we '''temporarily''' discontinue use of the Era template until we can determine what is causing text problems, especially for Google Chrome users. If we can't fix the problem, then I would suggest deleting the template -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 23:09, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
:To be honest, I have to agree. Whatever has and will be done to that template will always have an issue with it. I had to revert to an older version of that template the other day because it was leaving the [[:Category:Templates without documentation|Templates without documentation]] on '''every''' page that used Era. I think it would save a lot of heartache and time if we just deleted the template. {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:13, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
::There's a discussion on community portal about whether Era should be deleted. --[[User:Guilherme Guerreiro|<span style="color:orange">Guilherme Guerreiro</span>]][[File:Thanks rose.png]]([[User talk:Guilherme Guerreiro|<span style="color:orange">talk here</span>]]) 23:14, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
:::I don't necessarily know if it should be deleted outright, but I do think we need to disable it for the time being. I'm going to try to do so right now. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 23:22, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Line 259:
== Pet infobox issue ==
 
As some of you may know, [[Special:LonelyPages]] was largely polluted with Player Stories pages for Pets, due to the Infobox not showing the link to the Player Stories pages. I have managed to borrow the Player Stories code from [[Template:NeighborhoodInfobox]] and ported it to the Pet infobox, which now shows links to the Player Stories pages on the actual Pet page, however if the infobox says the name of a game and it turns from grey to another color due to the game, the box with the Player Stories link doesn't change color accordingly. You can see the changes I made on [[Template:Pet]], so if anyone knows a workaround that allows us to keep the template working as it is on the Pet pages while being able to change color accordingly, they will find it easier to add it, seeing as I'm a failure with Infoboxes myself. :P {{GGsigLabSig}} 13:34, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Background issue ==
Line 277:
 
:Transparency (if I understand what you mean right) is not working in Chrome for me, either. --[[User:BobNewbie|<span style="color:red; text-shadow: green 0 4px 4px;">'''BobNewbie'''</span>]] [[User talk:BobNewbie|<span style="color: red ; text-shadow: green 0 4px 4px;"><sup>∞(Talk)∞</sup></span>]] 19:33, July 27, 2011 (UTC)
::I think the issue was caused by an update to the [[Special:ThemeDesigner|Theme Designer]], as it added a transparancy option. I've removed the translucent CSS for now and set the transparancy up to maximum in the Theme Designer and what you currently see is the best I can get it. I'll ask JoePlay about this issue and see what he thinks. {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:57, July 27, 2011 (UTC)
[[w:User:Sannse|Sannse]] has written:
Hey everyone, an update on the CSS changes for backgrounds.
Line 291:
== Another navbar glitch (potentially ongoing issue) ==
 
I (and probably others too) have noticed that the navigation bar keeps changing yet noone has made any modifications to it. Yesterday I removed some JavaScript from the [[MediaWiki:Wikia.js|Wikia.js]] file to see if that was causing the issue. It seemed to have temporarily fixed the issue but it came back within the last few minutes. I managed to fix it again with [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=MediaWiki:Wiki-navigation&diff=prev&oldid=315225 this edit] to the [[MediaWiki:Wiki-navigation|Wiki-navigation]] page, which seemed to fix the issue once again. Given that our navbar is "heavily modified" in comparison to that of some other wikis, it's possible that my edit had provided a long term solution but for now, I'm unsure what it was that caused the problem. If you see any more issues related to the navbar, feel free to post them here and someone can take a look. {{GGsigLabSig}} 21:06, September 24, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Glitching in display of vgversion templates? ==
Line 305:
 
::If I preview this, copy the (corrected) code, paste it into the edit box, and preview again, it properly resolves to <nowiki>[TS2:FT]</nowiki>, in the correct color. But when I view it in an article, such as [[Computer]], I still see the expanded code. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 15:10, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
:::I know a lot of the MediaWiki edit notices have been showing the code rather than the content recently so I'm not sure if it's a Wikia-wide issue or something. {{GGsigLabSig}} 17:35, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Navigation bar limits ==
 
As you probably would have noticed, we have activated the new navigation bar. The problem is that we don't have as much customisation space with the new navbar, meaning not every field we had on the old drop-down menus will show up. I'm aware that we did kind of "modify" the old navigation bar anyway but I'm not sure how to modify the new version. Unless someone is able to find a fix, I guess we'll just have to limit the amount of links we can put on the bar, but what do we drop? Thoughts? {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:14, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
:I've just given this a little bit more thought...as in very little :P. I think that the "Request <user right>" pages could have their links moved to [[Template:CommunityCorner|the Community Corner]] message or something. Yeah, that's all I've got. {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:25, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
::By my understanding of the menu, there's additional drop-down menus available within each option in each tab. So, for example if you selected the 'Content' tab, and went down to 'Sims', the menu (I think) can be set up to drop-down additional links (Bella Goth, Mortimer Goth, etc). -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 04:31, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
:::I've made some changes to the navbar, as well as moving the UTC clock from a position which is overlapped by the nav to onto the top navigation bar. {{WHsig|07:27, October 12, 2011 (UTC)}}
::::Looks fine to me. {{GGsigLabSig}} 18:47, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
:::::Wogan, editing the top bar (the Wikia nav bar) is against Wikia's Terms of Use. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 20:26, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
::::::Based on this, I've removed the timer from the JS code for now (sometimes it takes a little while for the change to be visible). {{GGsigLabSig}} 20:33, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
:::::::Eh, my mistake there. I'll do some scouting around for some alternate solution. I had no idea it was some violation - RuneScape wiki is where I <s>stole</s> borrowed it from, so blame them :D {{WHsig|03:03, October 20, 2011 (UTC)}}
 
== Username highlight trial ==
 
[[User:Woganhemlock|WH]] and myself have decided to trial a username highlight for admins, bureaucrats and bots. Admins are <span style="color:red">red</span>, bureaucrats are <span style="color:limegreen">green</span> and bots are <span style="color:#66AAFF">light blue</span>. This is a trial for now and this thread is intended for those who don't like the feature to voice their thoughts or give feedback. {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:17, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
:I've made some tweaks to fix an issue with it not appearing on Wikia/Oasis/Whatever, and I've changed one of the colours slightly. {{WHsig|03:46, October 15, 2011 (UTC)}}
::After playing a bit with Pixie, I think some colors would fit nicely.
Line 328:
'''|_[[User:Andronikos_Leventis|<font type="Calibri" color="#A60914" size="2px">Andronikos Leventis</font>]]'''<sup> ''[[User_talk:Andronikos_Leventis|<font type="Calibri" color="#1404A2" size="1.3px">Talk</font>]]''</sup> 20:31, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
::I don't agree with this implementation; we already had a discussion about this, and it wasn't clear that the community wanted this. And I don't really see the point in admin highlight. --[[User:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">RoseGui</span>]][[File:Thanks rose.png]] <small>([[User talk:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">talk here</span>]])</small> 18:19, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
:::FWIW, [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/The_Sims_Wiki_talk:Community_Portal/Archive_14#Consensus it also wasn't clear that the majority of the community didn't want this], it was a generally neutral discussion with a few supports and only one vote that was anywhere close to an oppose. The feature is used on other wikis to help users identify admins/bureaucrats/bots etc. {{GGsigLabSig}} 18:43, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
::::Yes, but I don't believe the consensus was enough to make this trial, either. --[[User:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">RoseGui</span>]][[File:Thanks rose.png]] <small>([[User talk:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">talk here</span>]])</small> 20:07, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
:::::hi guys, i have some input about name highlighting. i dont think green and red is a good choice. for green: because our background color is green, bureaucrat signature will be hard to see. for example: GG signature on the main page. for red: i think its too bright, so when many admin here active, the recent wiki activity full with red color. i think the best color is color that "calm" and not too bright. for example: Andronikos red signature or blue color on wiki "publish" button. [[User:Wir.wiryawan|Wir.wiryawan]] 01:56, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
Line 340:
Today I did some testing with regards to anons (such as proving they can't disable the visual editor for them). When I carried out some visual editor/signature-related tests on my talk page via my IP, I noticed I never got a message notification when my IP was welcomed. I tried leaving an individual message for my IP and there was still no notification, which I think is due to the lack of the menu bar that all users will see at the bottom of the page as they scroll down. Given the warning system we use that applies for anonymous users and registered users, the anonymous user may not realise that they have been warned meaning that if they made another disruptive edit, they may be put under the impression that they were blocked for something immediately, which would be unfair on registered users.
 
My question is: Is there a way of implementing the "You have new messages" notification for anonymous users without breaking Wikia's ToS? {{GGsigLabSig}} 23:14, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
 
== Article Comments ==
Line 350:
::I just noticed that all the talk pages are gone. Not turned into comments -- gone. I don't know if we'll get them back if we turn article comments off, but now, I say we should turn article comments off now. [[User:Dharden|Dharden]] ([[User_talk:Dharden|talk]]) 02:06, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
:::Just had another instance of spam commenting. I've disabled them for now, waiting on a response from Wikia. {{WHsig|02:11, December 8, 2011 (UTC)}}
::::Why wouldn't I be surprised if this "Wikia bug" was yet another attempt for them to become Facebook? :/ {{GGsigLabSig}} 07:54, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
:::::@Dharden, I do believe that the talk subpage is saved if comments are enabled. For example, if article comments were activated for [[Bella Goth]], the page [[Talk:Bella Goth]] would remain, though the article would no longer link to it (a manual link would need to be created).
:::::To all, also note that comments are now disabled on the Fanon namespace. I imagine that since Wikia treats comments as separate pages that the comments are floating around somewhere, but currently they are not visible and were not moved into the individual article talk pages. I'd definitely suggest contacting Wikia to see if they can re-enable comments on just the Fanon NS. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 10:57, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Anonymous user