The Sims Wiki talk:Policy/Administrative Policies talk archives: Difference between revisions

imported>Nikel23
imported>Lost Labyrinth
Line 27:
:I agree - there's no point in keeping rights if you know you're not going to use them, especially if they're allowed to get them back later with little fuss. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LiR</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">speak</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">read</font>]]</sup>''' 02:29, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
::If an absent admin cannot provide their estimated date of return, they must at least explain their reason of absence clearly. But even though their reasons are not very reasonable, they still have the possibility to return when their obstacles irl are over. But if their reasons are like, "I don't have internet and I don't know when to return", it's fine to give them the inactivity timeout. [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] 03:43, May 14, 2012 (UTC)
:::While I do see the thought behind this, it seems (to me at least) that someone could go and use a reason such as "I have no internet, I don't know when I'll be back" as being a potential cover-up to a long term absence or for all we know, the user may never actually return. If a 3 month cut off point for absences was implemented, one would literally have 9 months from the start of their absence to return to activity, seeing as a user can request for their rights to be returned 6 months after being demoted (or anytime if they resigned at their own accord). Based on this proposal, I feel that if a user knows/suspects they'll be absent for a prolonged period of time (like over 3 months) then they should resign based on what LiR said above. {{GGsig}} 15:01, May 14, 2012 (UTC)