The Sims Wiki talk:Policy/Creation Policies: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>Lost Labyrinth (→Fanon Cleanup: new section) |
imported>LostInRiverview |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
Personally, I think we should relax whatever restrictions we have in place of users tagging fanon articles and just let non-admins do it too. After all, if the tag is added in good faith then what problems are there? If someone has a problem with someone tagging a fanon article then they can easily take it up with the user who did it or ask for a second opinion. If anyone can add a {{[[Template:Cleanup|Cleanup]]}} template to a mainspace article then I don't see what problems arise from someone doing practically the same thing to a fanon article. {{GGsig}} 16:24, May 16, 2012 (UTC) |
Personally, I think we should relax whatever restrictions we have in place of users tagging fanon articles and just let non-admins do it too. After all, if the tag is added in good faith then what problems are there? If someone has a problem with someone tagging a fanon article then they can easily take it up with the user who did it or ask for a second opinion. If anyone can add a {{[[Template:Cleanup|Cleanup]]}} template to a mainspace article then I don't see what problems arise from someone doing practically the same thing to a fanon article. {{GGsig}} 16:24, May 16, 2012 (UTC) |
||
:If it's the case that non-admins will be able to add the tag, then I think that non-admins should also be able to remove the tag. Otherwise, you have a situation where non-admins are 'locked in' by the actions of a non-admin that they're not allowed to override due to the rule. Otherwise, I'm fine with this. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LiR</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">speak</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">read</font>]]</sup>''' 17:03, May 16, 2012 (UTC) |
|||