The Sims Wiki talk:Requests for bureaucratship: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

The Sims Wiki talk:Requests for bureaucratship (edit)

Revision as of 03:26, 9 October 2010

1,365 bytes added , 13 years ago

→‎Close requests?

VisualWikitext

Anonymous user

imported>LostInRiverview

Revision as of 14:07, 31 August 2010 (edit) imported>LostInRiverview (→‎Ratification of Requests language) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 03:26, 9 October 2010 (edit) (undo) imported>LostInRiverview (→‎Close requests?)
(6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 82: ::A morris isn't inactive, she's just on vacation. Since she's active, she's the one that decides who is what. That means if she doesn't want to give you or anyone else bureaucrat priviledges, that's her decision. -- [[User:LostInRiverview\|Patrick (LostInRiverview)]]<small> ([[User_talk:LostInRiverview\|talk]])([[User_blog:LostInRiverview\|blog]])([[Special:Random\|random page]])</small> 01:33, August 27, 2010 (UTC) :What '''if ''' she leaves and becomes inactive , then i can put a rfb on central wikia?--[[user:Monster2821\| Danny (Monster2821)]]<small> ([[user talk:Monster2821\|talk]])([[special:random\|random page]])</small> 03:00, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Also,my above comment was an example:the one i just wrote and a while ago. == Ratification of Requests language == Line 102: ::::Oooh... that is a good question. What if, say, a user were on vacation or absent... Yeah, a week I suppose. I doubt anyone would nominate someone who was absent, and if that were the case, they could simply nominate them again when they return. -- [[User:LostInRiverview\|Patrick (LostInRiverview)]]<small> ([[User_talk:LostInRiverview\|talk]])([[User_blog:LostInRiverview\|blog]])([[Special:Random\|random page]])</small> 02:44, August 30, 2010 (UTC) :::::A week sounds good to me. '''[[User:Duskey\|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey\|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 11:08, August 30, 2010 (UTC) ~~:::::~~Alrighty - since the changes have been made and are accepted, I am in full support of the policy. -- [[User:LostInRiverview\|Patrick (LostInRiverview)]]<small> ([[User_talk:LostInRiverview\|talk]])([[User_blog:LostInRiverview\|blog]])([[Special:Random\|random page]])</small> 14:07, August 31, 2010 (UTC) :It all looks good to me, I say we implement it, open for nominations and archive this discussion. '''[[User:Duskey\|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey\|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 15:05, August 31, 2010 (UTC) == nominate dharden == can i nominate [[User:Dharden]]?--[[user:Monster2821\|Monster2821]] ([[user talk:Monster2821\|talk]]) 22:39, September 23, 2010 (UTC) :Yes, since the requests page is still open. If you do, though, be sure to tell him that you did so he knows to go to the requests page and either accept or deny the nomination. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview\|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview\|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview\|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 22:45, September 23, 2010 (UTC) == Close requests? == Should we close requests for bureaucrats now? --[[User:A_morris\|a_morris]] <small>([[User_talk:A_morris\|talk]])</small> 00:09, October 9, 2010 (UTC) :i was thinking to ask that.--{{SUBST:Signatures/Monster2821}} 00:16, October 9, 2010 (UTC) ::Yeah, I think 3 active bureaucrats is enough. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview\|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview\|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview\|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 03:26, October 9, 2010 (UTC)