The Sims Wiki talk:Requests for bureaucratship: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview |
imported>Duskey |
||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
:::Finally, on further thought, I believe Danny does have a valid point in suggesting self-nomination; a user may not necessarily want to nominate an admin if the admin hasn't shown any particular interest in a bureaucrat position, even if that admin would be willing to take on the position if nominated. But, I still stand by my previous idea, that a self-nomination should be seconded by at least one other user. -- [[User:LostInRiverview|Patrick (LostInRiverview)]]<small> ([[User_talk:LostInRiverview|talk]])([[User_blog:LostInRiverview|blog]])([[Special:Random|random page]])</small> 23:34, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
:::Finally, on further thought, I believe Danny does have a valid point in suggesting self-nomination; a user may not necessarily want to nominate an admin if the admin hasn't shown any particular interest in a bureaucrat position, even if that admin would be willing to take on the position if nominated. But, I still stand by my previous idea, that a self-nomination should be seconded by at least one other user. -- [[User:LostInRiverview|Patrick (LostInRiverview)]]<small> ([[User_talk:LostInRiverview|talk]])([[User_blog:LostInRiverview|blog]])([[Special:Random|random page]])</small> 23:34, August 22, 2010 (UTC) |
||
::::I agree with what LIR says, the rule of 2nd is very nice. I've sort of used it myself when suggesting new stuff, if there's no 2nd, there's no need to keep discussing the issue. '''[[User:Duskey|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 04:59, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
|||